- Oct 16, 2007
- 10,648
- 19
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- IC, SAC (Titans), EC, Daredevils
lol.i would like Rancid back on board as he was one of our best, Duds was one of the reasons he left.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol.i would like Rancid back on board as he was one of our best, Duds was one of the reasons he left.
A 'life' ban is way too harsh for anything, seems like it was personal to me! IMO
Hey Duds, youre a blonk for getting banned for life, I for one will miss youre antics, bloody sooks need to toughen up though, its only words on a screen, not like youve posted someones home address and threatened to kill them....did you?
If you really upset someone that much, it should have been edited and highlighted instead of totally deleted, the backlash from all of us would have been enough to make you pull up, and if a life ban was warranted, so be it, but my guess is you bagged a mods friend, simple as that!
Nothing I say will bring you back mate, but I at least had to say my peace!..
Sounds like the Dudley fella is a tool
HAIL BLOODY HITLER!!!
you cant even make a bloody post about duds getting banned, check out the last cple of days discussion on the 'List Issues' thread, its been deleted back to the 10th, this boards losing me, the main board doesnt get censored for peoples personal pleasure like this, it feels like the screws reading youre mail in jail.(not that id know)...
I dont like our moderator, takes it too personal and thinks this board is all his, not ours!
(this post will be deleted fast and ill prob get a card, seeya all..)
4. Stay on topic: Primarily we would like this board to be used for discussion relating to the Sydney Swans football club. If it's light hearted chit-chat you're after, we recommend you use "The Troy Luff Stand" because that is a sub-board created for Swans Fans for the sole reason of off topic discussion. We would appreciate it if this one was used if you want to post something off topic. If not we'll move it there for you.
No I don't take it too personally. No I don't think this Board is my own. But what I will say is that for a long time a set of rules has been in place for ALL members be they Swans fans or visiting opposition fans to follow and that I and my fellow moderator Dan police it closely. If you fail to read the rules - tough luck, you don't like the way the board is run - tough luck, I'm not here to make friends.
I'm allowed to removed posts from ANY thread on the Main Club Board THAT ARE OFF TOPIC. Please tell me what in ANY way does the banning of Dudley from the Swans Board have to do with the List Issues facing the club going forward into this season?
NOTHING
Hence why said posts were removed. Also if you EVER bothered to read the rules of the Board (which I bet you haven't) you would of read Rule 4.
I removed the posts and labeled them ALL as off topic, not "Dudley discussion can't have any of that". I have allowed it and in fact responed to it on The Troy Luff Board because that is where it because on the off topic Sub Forum. If you feel that it doesn't then I will close down The Troy Luff Board and go with only the Main Board and not allow ANY off topic discussion.
But thats not fair, thats not right and thats not going to happen. Because you know as well as I do that overeacting to something is not the way to go and personally your overreacting to me doing my job as a moderator and removing off topic posts on the Main Club Board as per the rules.
youre post might have taken you half an hour to write
Wtf? Why is roospoos banned?
Before I joined i used to read bigfooty from time to time for a year or two.
It wasnt unfair to describe the swans board as the dead zone.
Now with the amount of active users just starting to kick, which encouraged me to join and post please be careful not to destroy it by going overboard.
Please also be careful you dont jump at shadows.
Bingo!!
I saw your post basically as soon as you posted it and before you deleted it and therefore took the time to give you the answer to your post because you raised questions and points which I felt I should answer. When I posted my reply, I saw your post was deleted and having gone to the effort of replying to it I decided to undelete your post because I had quoted your post in my reply. I'm sorry that if undeleting your post upset you, but I only did it because I replied to a post you made. I do respect a person decision to delete there own post.
I'm not looking to ban anyone (unless someone does something to get themselves banned), run anyone out off the board or even kill off this board. Because I'm proud of this board and what it has become because of the people who use it and not of my moderation.
If people have any questions about how this board is run, please shoot off a PM to either myself or Dan and we will go out of our way to answer any problems or questions you might have. I wanted to as open as possible with the banning of Dudley because I knew most of you would be asking questions. I answered them and I will continue to answer such questions. But trust me I'm not hiding anything that will paint me in a bad light and Dudley's banning was earned and he has since proved that decision correct.
Can we have full disclosure to these questions in relation to the Dudley banning.
Was the complainant a moderator on another swans forum?
Is the bigfooty moderator who actioned her complaint also a moderator on the other forum?
do the two people concerned have communication in any way outside the said forums?
There is some feeling here in relation to a life banning of a regular poster who at times could be abrasive but hardly offensive. Could some relation to what was said to warrent the banning be included in replies.
The comment as I understand it was hardly at the punishable level, but if my understanding is incorrect please demonstrate to us.
Up to now I thought the swans board had been moderated terrifically but I suppose this incident has me questioning what happened and that any permanent loss of a genuine poster as opposed to a troublemaker.
It's not going to make a difference but thought the questions are worthwhile.
Let's not forget SouthSwans and her POTY
and I have no plans on banning or issuing infractions to anyone else.
lmao
What about that squib bateman?
we should have a system where a certain number of points, say like a demerit point system where if you have behaved they get reduced.
If you get to a certain number you might be banned for a month or even two but have a chance to wipe off points with good behavior.