For those watching Channel 9..
http://officialmemorabilia.com.au/
They are trying to flog a framed bat with the PERSONAL signatures of all 6 Australians who have scored 300+, for $2995...
It claims they are all personally signed by all 6 batsman...despite Bradman being dead (claims his personal signature was acquired from the Bradman Foundation-hardly the same is it), and Clarke in the middle of a test match, probably slept for yonks after his innings.
And then, in the picture next to the bat with the signatures on it, it's hard to see, but I'm confident it only has Clarke's score as 300...yet, he got 329*, did he not? Is that from their desperation to flog it before he got out, or just a mistake...every other batsman has their proper score on..
Bored while waiting for another wicket, so that's why this thread was made.
But has Channel 9 flogging memoribilia gone to far with this example? 3 grand for probable computer generated (or however they make mass signatures) signatures on a bat, with 1/6 scores being wrong...
http://officialmemorabilia.com.au/
They are trying to flog a framed bat with the PERSONAL signatures of all 6 Australians who have scored 300+, for $2995...
It claims they are all personally signed by all 6 batsman...despite Bradman being dead (claims his personal signature was acquired from the Bradman Foundation-hardly the same is it), and Clarke in the middle of a test match, probably slept for yonks after his innings.
And then, in the picture next to the bat with the signatures on it, it's hard to see, but I'm confident it only has Clarke's score as 300...yet, he got 329*, did he not? Is that from their desperation to flog it before he got out, or just a mistake...every other batsman has their proper score on..
Bored while waiting for another wicket, so that's why this thread was made.
But has Channel 9 flogging memoribilia gone to far with this example? 3 grand for probable computer generated (or however they make mass signatures) signatures on a bat, with 1/6 scores being wrong...