Remove this Banner Ad

Recent content by BlueWorld

  1. B

    Lindsay Tanner says Jobe should keep the Brownlow...

    There was clear evidence of doping by Watson. ASADA did theinvestigation with the afl and found him guilty. if they're going to do that all the banned players will be demanding they ignore the bans.
  2. B

    AFL denies deal to Essendon players

    You must have had b your head in the sand if you missed all those people saying they knew the outcome right down to the specifics of insufficient evidence. According to ross Stevenson it came from someone within the afl.
  3. B

    AFL denies deal to Essendon players

    Mark Stevens, Ross Stevenson, Offsiders, SEN, The Footy show to name a few. It was commented on here at the time and followed up by plenty of "I told you so's".
  4. B

    AFL denies deal to Essendon players

    Really? So Timmy knows it all. How did every journo know the exact outcome days before it was announced? I think the disappointed one will be you
  5. B

    AFL denies deal to Essendon players

    No everyone else knew other than the AFL. I guess it was just lucky guessing by all those saying the exact decision days before it was handed down.
  6. B

    WADA to appeal Dank decision

    No one was found innocent. And Dank was found guilty on some of the charges so he's hardly innocent.
  7. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    They were not cleared. Just because the tribunal couldn't be comfortably satisfied they received TB4 doesn't mean they definitely didn't.
  8. B

    Doc Reid

    They had large numbers of injections but weren't told anything? If they didn't ask what they were being injected with and didn't check then they didn't do what they were required to do.
  9. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    So the players make the decisions. :rolleyes:
  10. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    Activity on this board has gone down because there's no new news. Doesn't mean people no longer care. Lots more to play out. People want to know what happened.
  11. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    Yet your club stood by and asked ASADA to investigate and won't go near the man who supposedly ripped them off.
  12. B

    If not guilty doesn't mean innocent...

    If it was legal why no records? People assume guilt when the club act guilty as they have for the last 2 years. If they had nothing to hide this would have been cleared up a long time ago.
  13. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    No.
  14. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    ASADA never offered him a job. But don't let facts get in the way of your rant.
  15. B

    Appeal ASADA v Dank (AFL) WADA V Players CAS(Nov), WADA v Dank? New evidence players tested TB4

    WADA aren't interested what the AFL tribunal found. Complaints that the poor players have to endure more delays are the fault of the club for not having records. The excuse that there are no records won't be tolerated due to the world wide precedent it sets and that is why they are appealing.
See more

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom