I recall Greg Williams got his injunction when he recieved 9 weeks for pushing the umpire and he kept playing. For memory, I think he got his suspension reduced to 6 weeks. (I could be wrong)
Does anyone know unequivocally if, hypothetically we get our points stripped next month, and then we appeal it in court, do we play finals pending the court case or does the AFL have the power and final say?
2 important questions;
1.Does anyone know who has the final say and most power (AFL or WADA)?
Can either over-rule the other?
2. If, for example we are banned for 12 months in August and then we take it to court, do we play the finals until the court case is resolved? (As Im anticipating...
I agree 100%. I have had heated arguments with several close friends that I have never argued with in the past. Some of them are hell-bent on seeing us go down and are overlooking the legal process.
I can't imagine Whately would have made those statements without Vlad coming on the show. Vlad has worded him up to prepare the football public that we are getting off. As for Caro, she's paid to be controversial so just ignore her. She's not there for her journo talent.
ACC statement today;
The Australian Crime Commission sought expert advise from ASADA at the time of developing the Organised Crime & Drugs report and was advised (correctly) that AOD-9604 is not prohibited under category S.2 of WADA prohibited list"