Remove this Banner Ad

Recent content by nighthawk

  1. nighthawk

    2012 Player X v Player Y (Part 2)

    Re: Player X v Player Y Which did you go with? :(
  2. nighthawk

    2012 Player X v Player Y (Part 2)

    Like many, I'm looking to upgrade Greene. Looking at either Watson or Selwood as the two best options (I'm just shy of the cash for Thompson). Selwood is cheaper, more proven historically and has probably scored better on average this year, minus the game he got injured. I thought that Watson...
  3. nighthawk

    2012 Player X v Player Y (Part 2)

    Re: Player X v Player Y So, I'm trading out Shiel, and I'm not sure whether to get on McDonald (GWS) or just go straight for Mitchell. I can afford it. If I go for McDonald, I would have alot of cash sitting in the bank ($320k) and that means that next round I can do a couple of up trades...
  4. nighthawk

    Random Question Thread (Part 4)

    Is it worth trading out Martin? I think I'm going to keep Fyfe unless I hear anything, but Martin seems to be highly under-performing. I could do a swap for Robinson or Sidebottom, surely it would produce more points and at the moment it's almost a straight swap, but the question is, is it...
  5. nighthawk

    2012 Player X v Player Y

    Re: Player X v Player Y Waters + cash OR Mackie Any thoughts would be appreciated!
  6. nighthawk

    2012 Player X v Player Y

    Re: Player X v Player Y McDonald + Goddard OR Coniglio + Mackie + 1 extra trade in the bank
  7. nighthawk

    Round 1 Trades

    Lake --> Mackie, Waters, Goddard or someone else? To get Goddard, I'd have to do another trade, Coniglio > Mcdonald maybe. I already have Birchall, Shaw, Deledio and Broughton. I'm thinking Mackie will score well enough and might even beat his average last year which makes my dollars better...
  8. nighthawk

    Post Your Team (Part 2)

    Thanks for that insight friend :) I was thinking with Gia that he has been very consistent for a few years now, but I'm not totally sure about him... What do you think of the Hurley pick? I'm trying not to be biased, but I genuinely feel his scores will improve and he's already been fairly...
  9. nighthawk

    Post Your Team (Part 2)

    Hey guys, been out of the game for a few years, would really love some thoughts! Even just quick comments would be great. Def: Goddard, Deledio, Birchall, Broughton, Lake, Hargrave, Ellis, (Bugg, S. Morris) Mid: Pendlebury, Ablett, Selwood, Corey, Coniglio, Magner (C. Smith, D. Shiel) Ruck...
  10. nighthawk

    Fletchers save?

    I wasn't at the game, so I can only go off what I saw on TV. But, having watched and re-watched, and as the commentators point out, you can't tell whether it either did or didn't touch either the post or Fletcher's hand. Certainly looks unlikely, but at best you can say it's unclear. My point...
  11. nighthawk

    Coaching Staff Past Coach: Matthew Knights - Finally gets his second shot - 5/5

    Always hated that campaign. Definitely had potential, but they either needed to do it right or shoot for something else. IMHO, they failed.
  12. nighthawk

    Coaching Staff Past Coach: Matthew Knights - Finally gets his second shot - 5/5

    Haha. Thankfully on these boards there tend to be people who'll defend anyone associated with this list. It's good because it means there are no cheap shots. Any successful criticism must be well supported and logically explained. That's how criticism should be.
  13. nighthawk

    Coaching Staff Past Coach: Matthew Knights - Finally gets his second shot - 5/5

    Amen. It seems the OP thinks the "suprise factor" is more important than playing the best team available. Perhaps we should've found a way to get Bock into the ruck? That would've suprised the hell out of them, they would've been screwed. Stupid Knights, crap coach, not thinking of that Bock...
  14. nighthawk

    Rnd 12: Changes Vs Geelong

    A team coming close to winning doesn't mean that you don't take out the ones who under-performed. Especially if people at Bendigo are banging on the door. It's not just "we were a good team this week so let's keep it at that." If there are changes to improve your team of course you take them.
  15. nighthawk

    Round 11 The Sydney Swans vs. The Essendon Bombers

    You seem so close to exploding, maybe this will do it: http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/95854/default.aspx Ignore the rest of the sentence that follows though. Also, no offence intended mate in case you take it the wrong way. I just thought it was funny that you were...
See more

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom