Recent content by phantom13
-
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Oh no not the gender nuetral bathrooms (that exist pretty much everywhere anyway). Life must be ****ing terrifying at home with your gender nuetral bathroom. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Is intolerance of the intolerant really an issue? Quite the existential query. Uh huh. Was there a scary question on the admission form about that too? -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
You have to tolerate the gays and the trans. Tough gig that. You’re a real trooper. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
I see you’re not familiar with synonyms. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Ahhh no, my point is that absolutely none of it is clear? They made the rules so decrying that the rules suck is a bit pointless. Again I’m tipping his prior is absolutely admissible which isn’t fair but also not really worth debating. I literally said today that the tribunal is all the worst... -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
You’re still speaking like it’s a court, it’s not, I have little doubt his previous incident likely influenced the outcome and I’d bet there’s absolutely nothing in their process that forbids it -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Makes as much sense as most of this process so I’d say it’s live -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Really lost it at “normal behaviour” for pronouns. At best who cares at worst gender affirmation isn’t normal. Modern society seems just fine with it, I’d suggest moving on. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
The process is dogshit but it’s a bit pointless decrying the process in regards to the outcome at this point. Semantics over finding him guilty will only dictate the sentence (and we’re all expecting that to be extreme). Bont, Cripps or anyone wise without a prior isn’t a fair comparison... -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
I think they’ll give him 10 cause they don’t give a shit about anything but sending a message at this point. The logical outcome (noting none of this has been logical) would be a lesser sentence due to mitigating circumstances with the evidence and process to ensure this doesn’t go to court... -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
All a bit moot when the afl has made it clear that language won’t be tolerated in its environment though isn’t it. Given pretty much every single workplace in Aus or the rest of the western world is the same maybe just don’t say it -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
… sure. Forest for the trees. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
Fair enough, it seems pretty obviously implied that you support that persons position that suspending him is the wrong course of action. I don’t agree with that. -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
I agree with all this except to note that they did satisfy the burden of proof according to their own rules, which is obviously an issue of itself. I have a real issue with the continued line of shit being thrown at the accusers though. If you believe that Lance probably did say it then they... -
VFL Lance Collard Tribunal hearing
So that person speaks for all but others don’t? The AFL made it clear that you say this stuff you get suspended, they didn’t do that in a vacuum. I mean the original point there was about whether this could qualify as slander so the “put yourself in the players shoes” comment doesn’t make...