- Joined
- Oct 4, 2019
- Posts
- 905
- Reaction score
- 1,436
- AFL Club
- GWS
For me and Kane for that matter it's not about training loads it is more about the access to the players for coaches. Imagine getting put in charge of a very young list and trying to implement all your ideology, systems and game style only for the players to never be there over summer.These guys are roughly on the clock pretty much every weekend and most days during the week. They get about six weeks break at the end of the season before having to show up again, and they'll be expected to keep themselves in shape over that period too. The AFLPA are fine - they wanted an extension to be optional, it is, people don't need to show up.
The commentary around it is doubly wrong though - the young players (years 1-4) are mandated to show up from day 1. It's the more senior players that get two weeks of optional offseason who decided to forgo it.
Such an advantage for the older well drilled teams who are established and have played together for close to a decade now (Geelong, Collingwood, Brisbane) and such a disadvantage for teams like Richmond, West Coast and to a certain extent Melbourne now.
On the physical side of things let's be honest here. Are player more or less likely to be in top condition if they are training by themselves as opposed with the whole list together and coaches watching over them guiding them and pulling them up on standards?




