Remove this Banner Ad

Media Thread 2026: Insightful, Inciteful and Incomptent

  • Thread starter Thread starter Doashuey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If the AFL insist on keeping OR in its current format, the simple most obvious solution is to have the teams that didnt play in OR play each other in R1 and the teams that played in OR play each other.

The fix is just so bloody obvious.

Or scrap OR altogether
 
If the AFL insist on keeping OR in its current format, the simple most obvious solution is to have the teams that didnt play in OR play each other in R1 and the teams that played in OR play each other.

The fix is just so bloody obvious.

Or scrap OR altogether

It’s such an obvious fix to the problem, whether it be real or perceived.

Teams should go into matches with as close to similar lead ins as possible. It can never be exact but there’s times when the AFL doesn’t even seem to bother

Same goes for the bye rounds when you have a team coming off a bye playing a team that played the previous week. Why not have the teams who have a bye, play amongst each other the following week so their respective preparations are relatively equal
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If the AFL insist on keeping OR in its current format, the simple most obvious solution is to have the teams that didnt play in OR play each other in R1 and the teams that played in OR play each other.

The fix is just so bloody obvious.

Or scrap OR altogether
OR is supposedly to promote AFL in the northern states while NRL goes to Vegas.
OR simply instead of this fkd up thing they have where all the inequalities of the fixtures just get worse, it should be all the 4 northern states host VIC teams, not WA teams as we already travel to excess.

To promote footy as it was intended and bring all teams into OR, the remaining 6 Vic teams play in WA & SA.
 


Was going to post this but you’ve done it for me

EVERYONE should read this

Goes into great detail what we’re doing around player development and gives some background on the man we’ve entrusted to guide it

As it says in the article, the improvements won’t necessarily be immediate but will show in the years to come

Talks a bit of Hamish Davis and his drive to improve which is bringing other players along with him

It’s a really good read
 
Hamish Davis, he's the one for mine, he comes in and asks, 'who's going to help me today'?

I wish I was as certain of other things in my life as knowing you’d be in here posting this
 
That was a fantastic read thanks. Shout out to my boy Davis:

"He (Davis) is probably the number one player who's out on the shed floor. He comes in and asks, 'who's going to help me today', and he brings two players with him, so all of a sudden, the tide is rising and we're getting better as a group," Maddocks said."
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Was going to post this but you’ve done it for me

EVERYONE should read this

Goes into great detail what we’re doing around player development and gives some background on the man we’ve entrusted to guide it

As it says in the article, the improvements won’t necessarily be immediate but will show in the years to come

Talks a bit of Hamish Davis and his drive to improve which is bringing other players along with him

It’s a really good read
It's actually a great insight and article about our development program, can see why WC went after Maddocks.
Nice the AFL have actually talked something positive about WC, I have always found Schmook a decent and fair writer.

Shame we have to listen/read to all the other talking heads that offer very little, hourly.
 
Not just their "handballing". The 2016 Dogs took the piss when it came to dropping the ball to advantage in a tackle.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

"Beveridge wanted to implement a game style that included lightning-fast handballs"

Or as they are also known, throws
Snoop Dogg GIF by Complex
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom