I know it's bad but I switched off the TV last night and watched something else.
Seriously considering packing all Mt freo gear in a box and just staying away for a while.
Sick of feeling like this.
Maybe I put too much in to a bunch of men running after a piece of leather.
The way I understand it, the voice can advise the Government on issues. The Government does not have to act on the advise.
So my question is, if the Government does not act on the advise, it will probably get taken to the high court.
I would think that the high court would check that the...
I want to vote yes, but I am scared that the really good intent of this will be taken, bastardised and used in a way that it is not intedned. I know this could be just fear mungering from the No campaign.
Apparently there are constitutional lawyers and ex judges that say the scope is too wide...
Funny, everyone used to say that about the team when Ross was coaching and Connelly.
Wasn't the big 2006 turn around due to the team saying to Connelly, just let them play and don't try to control everything.
I was shocked when they subbed him yesterday.
Felt the game was in the balance and it was a risky move.
However, Johnson came on, did his bit and the rest is history
This is why I am not an AFL coach
I thought that todau too.
The seemed to rush through it.
When I played and we's sing our team song after a win, it was a good sing along with gusto. Not rush though it as quick as possible......first world problems :)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.