Search results for query: *

Happy with the return of white socks, but I'm not a fan of the shade of green used in the home kit. Far too light, it makes it look more like a South African kit.

Mills falls short again: 18/11/9/7

Close call from Dunkley: 10/15/12/7

Updated F1 graphics. They look clean, but I don't like how they've removed the team colours from the leaderboard. Also the lap counter seems tiny and you can barely make out the tyre choices.

Facebook changed their profile picture to this.

The new logo is horrible in isolation, but if this is what they're going for I actually don't mind it. However I doubt this is the case the new logo now says 'Leagues' which leads to me to believe that they are using the same logo for the W- and Y-Leagues as well.

I didn't think it was that bad last night. But I agree that when a royal blue team takes on a team in black/navy the away team should wear their clash.

https://theathletic.com/news/serie-a-green-kit-ban/S5nA0rJX8mma

Looks like Touk Miller will fall short on marks. 8/11/1/10 at half time.

Two weeks in a row with someone missing out on handballs. Incredible!

So red and royal blue clash but navy and royal blue don't? Not sure I understand the AFL's logic.

It's a bit silly to have GWS in their home jumper and white shorts against Collingwood: the front of both kits is predominantly black and white. Giants really need an all orange kit for games like this.

I can't remember too many clashes in the NBA, this surely must go down as the worst.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-9235939/Premier-League-clubs-blunder-FIFTH-colour-blind-kit-clash-season.html Thought this was an interesting part of the article: 'When the Premier League receive the kit choices from the clubs they run the software and highlight if it...

Why aren't the Heat wearing their black kit against the Strikers? I know there's never technically a clash in cricket, but having both teams wearing basically the same blue kit looks silly.

It's been mentioned here many times, but I don't understand why they don't go with a red/yellow Blackburn Rovers style jumper. No other club in the league uses that design and it also gives off surf-lifesaving vibes.

Pretty cool detail on these kits: In collaboration with our apparel partner, adidas, no matter the location, our new away jersey ensures we will always have the great city of Melbourne with us. A special and unique feature of our away strip incorporates Melbourne’s city grid carefully...

How could i forget

Saw this on Facebook. The Liverpool away tops with unique patterns. Has something like this ever been done by a manufacturer?

A simple solution would be to mandate that all clubs produce three different kits, all with a different predominant colour. Home team wears whatever they want, away team wears the kit that provides the most contrast (with a preference to use the home jumper if possible) with matching shorts...

New Tune Squad unis

I know it's a minor issue, but Essendon should really be in red shorts today. There's no real need for them to even have white shorts in the first place.

It's crazy that in the space of a few hours, the AFL can go from getting it so wrong (Carlton in all navy against West Coast) to getting it so right (Kangaroos in all white against Melbourne).

Not at all. Just because two jumpers don't clash doesn't necessarily mean that they are both contrasting. Using last night as an example, navy and royal are different enough to avoid a clash. However, since they are similar colours there is very little contrast.

Melbourne's away is good enough to avoid a clash with Adelaide, but I don't think it provides enough contrast. Personally, I think that sides should not wear royal against home teams that have predominantly black/navy jumpers.