Search results for query: *

Notice how instead of ever defending your own stance, you only ever attack me. Further illustrating just how much of a baby you are. You're worthless, you should really stop.

Awww boohoo, sooky little snowflake calls me a w***er because I believe people are free to say whatever they like in private. I'd hate to imagine how veterens from past wars would react to weak softcocks like you.

You don't know much about football then. Croatia are clearly the better team.

Even back in 2010 when they won it, it was on the back of a string of 1-0 wins. They struggled to score then with the tiki-taka gamestyle. Back then, they had Xabi Alonso, Xavi and Iniesta at his best, along with an actual gun striker in David Villa, all of them being all time great players...

Spain are complete garbage and deserve nothing. No x-factor, no imagination, completely one dimensional. Russia are also trash and will be knocked out in the next round.

Holy moly Spain are terrible. This is worse than Wenger Arsenal; at least that team mostly put rubbish teams away with ease.

Spain are extremely mediocre. When you have all time greats like Xavi, Iniesta and Xabi Alonso at their best, you can win easily playing pure possession football, but when you have players who are a class below, it's just going to be one-dimensional. Need to bring on someone who can take on...

I certainly don't have any respect for you, snowflake. The same applies for everyone else like you, who think private conversations need to be regulated.

I'm just not a sook like you who thinks we need thought police.

Does anyone have a link to a clip where Lucy Zelic says Yordan Henderson or Hamez Milner? I have someone who badly wants to see it. Is it even real?

It was. Just because snowflakes like you want to live in an authoritarian state doesn't mean he shouldn't be allowed to make crass jokes within his private conversations.

I could just as easily say a spud like David Mackay gets tagged just as much, and use it as an argument to prove he's better than Mitchell, and it would be just as worthless. and yet you think you're qualified to conclusively state he was tagged in the aforementioned games? Without even a spec...

There you go emphasizing quantity over quality again :D

Actually it's also about being the fairest player, which Mitchell isn't, because he deliberately elbowed Goldstein in the head. Thankfully Michael Christian likes him, therefore free pass.

Lol you're an idiot. Symbolism? Puberty hitting you pretty hard eh kid?

Because he's nowhere near as good in real life as he is in Fifa? Strikers aren't Argentina's problem. He wouldn't help.

Africa wins again. Argentina is a joke. Why did they sub out Rojo for Fazio? That's like subbing out a potato for an even bigger potato. You can't even come close to winning a world cup with a defence this bad. Also, they should retire Messi. He's playing like he doesn't care and clearly isn't...

What points? Telling people they're wrong isn't a point, it's a worthless post from a worthless poster.

You're not going to persuade anyone with idiocy like this. Either you back up your claims or stop posting. Nobody cares one bit about people who tell others they're "wrong" or "they haven't watched".

Sorry princess, I couldn't care less if you're a baby who gets offended easily. You can't back up any of your points, you shouldn't be making any posts here.

Careful now, Hawthorn fans are very sensitive to people highlighting truths like this. They've all convinced themselves Mitchell is the greatest player of all time.

Hope France go out. Their coach is pathetic and their players are pretentious w***ers.

How is that a personal attack? If anything, you calling me a tool is. You're both a hypocrite and a blind fan.

Just asking you, or anyone else to present evidence. Again, you're just making baseless claims and not actually showing anything. So we're supposed to believe he doesn't inflate his stats with cheapies because some people think he's a good player? Right, because the coaches and media are...

I am 100% sure you are not qualified to debate on this subject when you don't understand what needs to be presented in an argument like this.

What are you talking about? It 100% was. I am 100% sure you are wrong.

Except Cripps is much more damaging per disposal. That's the point a lot have been making; high numbers, not very effective, and you Hawthorn supporters have serious difficulty accepting that.

Sure is easy to say those clubs tagged him, not so easy to prove, is it sweetheart? Especially when you're not in the opposition coach's box. Armchair experts like yourself seem to think you have it all figured out.

Football fans like yourself sure love the word 'massive'. Such is the nature of people with limited vocabulary. He's a collector, not a damager, simple as that.

Wow, all that quantity. Another fluff statistic. It's easy to get 80% when you're not attempting anything with a high degree of difficulty.