Search results for query: *

Fair point. I'll clarify. "Unequivocally true to anyone that has an objective understanding of history."

This 1000%

Yeah that's how I read it as well. Consequently, the idea was quickly discarded.

Calm your farm mate. Just pointing out that the Hawkei is an absolute shambles. Ukrainians probably don't know the extensive issues with it.

I'll keep this excuse in the backpocket next time then 😅

Isn't the standard modus operandi that if you make a claim you can't/won't substantiate, it qualifies and misinformation and results in a threadban and/or infraction?

At least everyone knows she's a ****

I mean do you own a property that you rent out? Are you not trying to make a positive return on the investment on that property?

This definitely isn't the hill to die on

I In a nutshell, it's that you should pipe down about housing issues if you're trying to make a buck from housing at the same time. Especially when there are alternatives to creating wealth that don't involve screwing someone else out of the property market.

I doubt this is true. If it is, it's tokenistic and stupid.

So using Harvey Norman as an example. I'm year one and two the company made the same profit from operations (buying and selling goods etc, their day to day). However in year one the company sold a tonne of capital assets (infrastructure etc), and also borrowed alot of money. Comparatively in...

The disestablishment of protectionism is fine. Doing do while ensuring no social safety net (particularly Thatcher) is awful.

Is that profit from operations or holistic profits? Article behind a pay wall. Depending on the answer your statement could be incredibly misleading.

I'd honestly rather be in an M113 than a Hawkei. Those vehicles are a shambles. We also don't have many M1A1s to spare.

Wouldn't it be delicious irony if Thatcher was the first domino and thereby ultimate catalyst for neoliberalisms eventual downfall. The evil ****

I would imagine it's because even though you might not remember the specifics of it, the exposure to this stuff builds into children's subconsciousness that it isn't weird or abnormal.

Fair enough, sounds like my understanding was fairly bang on. Eh I don't see why anyone would get up in arms about the ACMA then.

Yeah I get that, but will these companies still be able to determine what constitutes misinformation in their own policies (e.g. they put it in their process that whether a comment is misinformation or not is upto moderator discretion)? Or will what constitute misinformation be mandated by...

Purely from a layman's legal point of view, I don't really understand the point of the legislation. "The ACMA will not have the power to request specific content or posts be removed from digital platform services." What's the point then? Can't service providers just work around it by picking...

I got threadbanned for calling out Lidia Thorpe's behaviour. Wouldn't hold your breath.

Christ what a kick

Yeah I've never understood how he gets a game tbh.

Daicos brothers shredding the Crows.

Getting smashed around the contest early.

This is so ******* stupid.

She walked away from an open cab door to walk back towards people and hurl abuse. Go to bed Chief.

I mean you flat out refused to acknowledge video evidence. But you do you clown Chief

No it doesn't. I'm not going through this with you again Chief. Refer to our previous discussion if you need to be re-educated again. I'm going to humour you and ignore that Lidia Thorpe is a federal senator arguing with some random pundits at a low end strip joint. Please explain how her...

We've gone down this rabbithole before Chief. You take what Lidia says as gospel, and dismiss all other evidence. You do you Champion. "Any white man that stands with a ******* black little c**t like that, yous can all get ****ed to" You wouldn't see any racist overtones if someone said this...