Search results for query: *

"tabloids" usually give a much shorter window. 24 hours + more time if required was generous. also note that none of the statements reference the ABC reporting, just that they had no opportunity to contribute to the Hawthorn internal review. they knew.

I agree that would be weird if you walked into court and Judge fishardansin was presiding but what could you do

Almost certainly it was because what they thought they were doing was in the best interests of the player through some sick logic. Likely in some cases the woman involved was seen as a destructive influence and they were doing it out of what they saw to be care, and nobody went against it...

Old mate is being a dog with a bone after misinterpreting a post a couple of pages back because he believes racism is pervasive rather than systemic and for some reason feels like fighting that fight at 9:45pm on Bigfooty. I would leave it

Perhaps because a prominent Indigenous sportsperson has spoken specifically about his experiences of systemic racism and people are choosing to listen to him? Dunno. Maybe we should listen to the random bloke on the internet

That’s not what systemic racism is, but also nobody is putting the pool anecdote forward as a specific example divorced from his broader comment which WAS specifically about systemic racism.

Literally just posted a clip where he spoke about how indigenous people face systemic racism across a whole range of areas including health, justice and education. If you can watch those clips, actually listen to what he is saying, and your response is still "yeah but that isn't an example of...

I don’t need to answer your question champ. Listen to what the man is saying and take it in.

“…the education system, the justice system, the health system…”

one for the “systemic racism does not exist” clowns

nobody is being deformed here

This theory about how the media and politicians are trying to "divide us" is exclusively perpetuated by cooked men on the internet who don't have the ability to listen to others. They also love to use the terms "woke", "plandemic" and "Dictator Dan"

It's pretty clear you don't understand the meaning of the term sir.

so which countries are the racist ones

I know that institutions have done a great job of undermining the public's faith in journalism, but still can't get my head around why people would be putting their faith in any investigation which has zero obligation to release findings to the public. The journalism looks sound here and we...

not that it's a crime not to be across the details but considering you seemed to miss both the reason for withholding names and the fact that the ABC had done investigation independently of the commissioned Hawthorn report, both which were clear from the article, I thought it was worth...

"Three families at the centre of the investigation have told ABC Sport about the grief and trauma caused by their experiences. On account of their complex mental health challenges, and the need to protect their children, their names have been changed." "ABC Sport put detailed questions about...

"According to the families of three players interviewed by ABC Sport, the incidents at the centre of the review allegedly took place during Clarkson's time as head coach, a period in which the club won four AFL premierships, including a historic treble between 2013 and 2015."

felt like Nank had first use the entire game but was preprogrammed to make it a 50/50 every time

so no way we are winning this week 😁

thanks for this. 👏

this is actually defacing the jumper

so who are we poaching now? Walsh to Tiges confirmed

agreed, this is absolute fantasy stuff

plus knowing us we’d probably use Pick 7 for someone tipped to go Pick 15 anyway

Josh "100m penalty" Caddy? That guy?

Replies - 1. Salt - massive.

lol

dud, delist

I think people can understand his role and think that seven disposals (four behinds, three handballs) is not the sign of a player who is at the peak of his game, pressure or otherwise.