Search results for query: *

Haven't beaten a team above them on the ladder ..........................

Enjoy

Dogs are contested beasts, been the most dominant team in that area all year. We lost the contested ball but won the game through 90+ ferocious tackles constantly applying pressure to the ball carrier and stopping any run. Pressure causes errors and there was very little time for anyone with...

LOL tough room. Just seems a lot in here want to knock, not acknowledge a hard fought mature win against a very good side. Think it will be a long time before we see the Dogs held to 6 goals again. P.S. Hawks clearly the dominant team by a long way for a long period even blind...

Injuries Poor skills Umpires Low Scoring blah blah blah That was an intense pressure tight game between 2 tough contested sides. Dogs were the highest % team in the comp before the game, they were held to 6 goals, by a team that had its defence questioned. Roos can't defend They haven't beaten...

Should get a new contract once non football stuff is delt with. Can definately play and will benefit for the sub rule being scrapped allowing teams to play an additional tall.

Alan Richardson was clear in his summation of the afternoon for Port. “We’re pleased we hung in there, but that would have been absolutely pinching the game,” he said. “We got beaten fairly badly across the day in the really critical markers. “The boys have clearly got a never say die...

We could have won by more if the roof was closed :)

2nd quote from a Port supporter admitting if they played better they could have won. There in lies the defining factor, in honesty both teams were average Port were just worse than North.

Scary when words can be backed by fact. Nah mate only 1 stat matters right?

though 10 points less s**t apparently

Aerial dominance causes players to hold. Bad tackling technique gives away frees. Good technique wins you frees. Superior clearance play draws holds. Im sure had Port not been dominated in these areas and hard superior technique the count would have been very different. And had the...

Can i please like this 50 times

Thank you for your honesty, had you improved in the areas you could control you could have won. But you didn't. Im sure your club is looking at changing what you can control rather than looking for excuses from what you cant.

Or any Port supporter willing to look at their performance and say they were beaten at the things they could control?

On todays performances i agree totally. Glad to get the win but not lining up for finals tickets on todays performance thats for sure.

Carlile - 1 mark Jonas - 1 mark Heath - 1 mark Thompson - 7 marks Fact is Port lost this game with their performance, rather than look for an excuse first up look in the mirror. Never going to say umpiring was great but the difference between a win and a loss for Port was their lack of...

Hartlett 7 touches Westhoff 3 marks, 0 goals, 11 possessions Stevenson 9 touches Heath 6 touches the umpires did this?

No arguement from me, your prime movers were beaten and that was the difference. As i said not a game for either side to be proud of.

Clearances 42-36 Contested possessions 159-128 Inside 50 54-43 Hartlett 7 touches Westhoff 3 marks, 0 goals, 11 possessions Stevenson 9 touches Heath 6 touches just a few stats to mention other than the easy out. Not a game for either teams to brag about. Port did well to keep coming...