Search results for query: *

Its dogmatism in a thread where the op claims the supernatural is true simply because people believe it? Science hasnt proven that supernatural forces dont exist in deep outer space and black holes. So yes you are technically correct. But in regards to anything that effects human life its safe...

No they dont exist. Science has basically proven this now with all observed events reduced down to a combination of only four forces. Belief in higher beings is false but helped scare people into behaving.

no one with a brain could give a stuff about clintons emails anymore. she aint in power and never will be and in any case the allegations are all small fry compared to the Russia/Trumps ones. But even if they werent they are still now irrelevant. No one cares (except Trump supporters either...

I know that. And it has what exactly to do with fake news?

The media and government are not the same people. Is that really too hard for you to understand? Although since you seem to think the CIA really runs Germany and Merkel is just a stooge for the CIA then I guess you are a lost cause.

Not really. Most of the forums which people use to spread fake news so that it can be seen by a significant amount of people are large companies like Facebook, Twitter, you tube etc. You can impose regulation on them. Non profit companies on the net don't have big audiences so it doesn't really...

So no answer then. Just admit that on this issue your initial view was wrong as there is no possible way the German authorities would do it. If they would do any faking it would be the opposite and try to cover up an actual Isis attack. People will value your opinions more on other topics if you...

So you have absolutely zilch then. An Islam terrorist attack like this can be the tipping point that kicks the pro immigration establishment out of power and you some how believe that they wanted an Islam terrorist attack to take place even though it brings about there own destruction. How does...

It may well be faked. But it's not faked by the MSM unless they know it's fake and if they do they get punished for it. And who said I believe everything the mainstream media prints?

Again not same the same. Passing on potentially fake information due to incredibly shoddy journalism is not the same as creating it. It's fake news if the MSM are making up the tweets and pretending a girl from Aleppo is saying them.

What was real? What are you talking about? How do you verify it's realness and what does any of that have to do with the point I'm making?

I'm not saying the Internet doesn't benefit democracy. It has massive benefits and has already prooved the downfall of dictatorships. And as you say it makes it harder for MSM to get away with lies as people now have much easier access to information and can let the regulators know if it is...

Your point is?

It's news that is made up. It's not just twisting the facts or only focusing on one part of the story or using dubious sources as the MSM can do. It's making up the facts and story. Something that the mainstream can't do because regulations prevent it, unless ofcourse theirs corruption involving...

Yes they did try to do that and it was complete crap. But it's not fake news. You don't get the meaning do you?

gina Rhinehart for Pm. She will fix it all.

Going to answer that first part of the post? And on the second I wasn't referencing any one particular example you provide.

The way the herald sun framed the Jobe Watson story is completely rubbish. But they didn't fake the story. Faking is on a whole other level.

Who are lieing and doing those things? And what you often call terrorists others would call rebels with a just cause.

the majority of major newspapers and news programs in the west. serious is a relative word and it has been dramatically lowered by the populists in the past year.

This is what scientists, economists and the serious mainstream media are thinking in respect to uniformed unintelligent populists.

Do you have some big examples of this?

Havnt seen any in this thread from what Ive read.

People arent in charge of regulation though. Rules and laws are what govern it with subjective human judgement only filling in the edges between them. are there any major examples of news from the mainstream media that have been shown to be out and out lies that were able to be verified as lies...

Corrupt yes but still are regulated against faking facts. Many of the non mainstream media are both corrupt and fake facts cos they don't face the same regulation. And ignoring stories is not faking them.

Biased opinions and fake news are not the same thing.

The poll in this thread just shows how stupid big footy srp board members have become.

Who are the democrats?

But I thought it was now agreed that september 11 was an inside job? Is this not true?

What exactly is the point of this post? I dont get it.