Search results for query: *

I wish it was. Im dumbfounded that i dont know selwoods number. Dont know Dangers either. :think:

Is it just me or are others also finding out in this thread that the joel selwood wore the number 14? i never really noticed what number he wore. sure there are players you associate with numbers. Bartel 3. Ablett 29. enright 44. But for me selwood just never was one. If you said geelong 14 the...

Wowee the run out of congestion through the middle.

Post blicavs world? two rucks is not a new thing. In fact its less common now then it previously was. ottens and blake/west, king and barnes, bourke and flanagan, barnes and stoneham.

A 206cm second ruck?

Nice video. But does he have a shimmy?

When was blitz ever a rebound marking defender? Blitz only ever played lock down defender when in defence.

We will never know. With sav and dekooning in the team it's hard to see how we would go for a third tall rebound marking defender with our first pick.

Sounds like we got him cos we lost Sav. Food for thought.

Rhyce Stanley!

I thought he only had a minor injury? He looked pretty good in the first half of the season.

Does anyone know how to pronounce Jhye? I don't have the foggiest. I don't see how jhy possible go together in the English language.

Any universe where parfitt doesnt have an injury riddled season. both are excellent defensively. But Parfitt kills atkins offensively.

Atkins

Can any left footer?

But it is.

He even looks exactly like jordan.

This description sounds exactly like jordan murdoch. And not in a bad way.

Thats what i thought you said.

Well I'm confused. First I read he is virtually no chance of playing a single afl game next year and now he won't play much vfl . Someone must be very wrong.

Brodie Grundy trade this year

Why does there have to be a need? Don't you just play the best players?

Except for the guy who said he would win 2 brownlows minimum. Guaranteed. selwood has none but priddis, ollie wines and tom mitchell has one. i cant compute this. selwood in the top 5 mids of his generation. yeah i rank him higher then pendlebury.

Agree. More games we get in to him the better. oh wait scott says differently. I change my mind. He needs to earn his spot first.

Or mackie started as a foward playing a menzel type role.

and evidence of it being wrong is what exactly? A feeling? A hunch? Go look at the videos of his last two practise games. in the video review of the last game of the season the player mentioned first as playing well is narkle who kicked 2 goals and had a heap of ball in the mids. The article...

It was a prediction. What have you got against predictions? ps. When have i been clearly wrong? You stated it as a fact. Can you back it up?

Moving him to defence is the end of him. Already have too many tall defenders.

I dont understand???:eek:o_Oo_O

Um sherlock was a fictional character guys.