Search results for query: *

Hird's comments and the fact that he is making them now are nothing short of pathetic. He doesn't know anything today that he didn't already know the day before the verdict. 'I did nothing wrong.' 'I did nothing wrong.' 'I did nothing wrong.' 'I did nothing wrong.' ....verdict is out and...

Hird was never going to be sacked because he would not be the only one in the club's hierarchy who knows exactly what went on. It's been abundantly clear from the outset that he would never have gone down with the ship (fair enough too), but if he was forced to walk the plank, he just looks like...

No it's not. It's about Thomas and Keefe. The other threads in here are about the whole Essendon football club; it's coach, it's wider staff and it's processes.

So let me get this straight....You're saying that if ASADA fails to prove any Essendon player took or 'attempted to take' (whatever that means) a banned substance, then the players are guilty anyway for failing to check if drugs they may never have taken, were banned? Nope

Absolutely, but it may not be necessary. The fact remains that if the players are not shown to have done anything wrong, they should not be banned. If ASADA does prove prohibited substances were taken, the players have a problem. If ASADA does not, then they do not. The standard of proof may not...

Why? I am a lawyer and in our legal system, the investigating/charging party must prove the party being investigated/charged is guilty. The party being investigated/charged is never under an obligation to prove his or her innocence, and is entitled to do nothing if the other side cannot meet the...