Will be ridiculous if melb dont bid green given hes prob 2nd best player in the draft
Not to mention you keep an extra player on the board at 9 with GWS using 4 to match
I always thought this was why they traded up to 6 to get jackson.
They have so many inside mids and barely ruck stocks.. surely a "grundy" for the next 10 years is best for them and there midfield
Bidding on green at 5 with no first rounder next year.
Basically uses up all there draft picks for 2 years. Thats what i meant.
They don't have alot of points
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.