Search results for query: *

Why would you do this in a practice match? If I was Ross I'd bring him back through the 2s even after the suspension. Looked much worse than SPP who is out a month. So be interesting to see what the tribunal (which he'll be sent straight to) does.

See what we have to deal with

Wow

All the way through 2022? And your reading that he was asking for advice is baseless.

I love it that the "conspiracy" is basically Scott and Hocking having a conversation where they both agree that the Cats are going to drop off eventually. Doesn't even say when. There is literally no media featuring Hocking that this man can't weave into a conspiracy narrative

Wow. You need to get out more

With a closed hand? Righto mate. I think dialogue might be a waste of both of our time here

No I do not mean that Sicily ran to the player, stopped, and looked directly at him when he stepped on his ankle. Selwood was stepping backwards not looking where he was putting his foot and stepped on someone. One was careless, one was intentional. Would think that was pretty clear

Your inferring a level of control on the outcome which clearly doesn't exist.

Thanks for actually responding with something that's at least based on interpretation of actual events rather than what's been said to here so far. But if you're using Cooper "Scoops" Gretch as a source then it's probably not a great way to add credibility I'll agree with you Tom Stewart's was...

If he doesnt control the Tribunal then where exactly is his supposed conflict of interest then? MRO sanctions are an offer to avoid Tribunal and non-binding. You've spent an inordinate amount of time on this thread without providing a single credible example of this supposed conflict of...

Me? Stop citing cases that show that Hocking doesn't control the tribunal to prove that he does

This is ridiculous. When asked for evidence of Hocking using any perceived power to affect an outcome you gave an example that proved he doesn't. You need to sit down for a while.

Are you high?

In any case, let's ask sit back and watch as there is zero change to the system with Hocking out

Hocking sets the trend of reference and gradings. Hocking clarifies that this is within the terms of reference as specified and Christensen sends it to tribunal accordingly. Tribunal over rules this, because shock horror, HOCKING DOESN'T CONTROL THE TRIBUNAL You are fake news

That's not how that works and you know it

Hocking is accountable for the gradings chart and terms of reference. Prosecutors or the MRO might ask clarification but anything outside that is not how the started system is set up. They're quite transparent about roles and responsibilities. If you're claiming that they're acting outside that...

I wouldn't expected Hocking to either. Go back and look at the photo, he was on the umpires bench not the cats bech

The prosecutor has a clear gradings chart, clear terms of reference and is provided video examples of what fits in what category before the season starts. If you're claiming that the prosecution is then ignoring said guidance and then just acting under direct instruction from Hocking to ignore...

This is complete hogwash. You understand the prosecutor follows a grading chart not Steve Hocking, you are intentionally misrepresenting the process. It's been explained to you often enough that you've gone from being ignorant to outright lying. The prosecutor elected to follow either severe or...

Also on this. You're right Hocking gave him nothing, because Hocking is not the MRO. Michael Christensen, a supposed stooge through which Hocking controls the universe apparently, referred him to the Tribunal with the exact same grading and punishment that the tribunal landed on. Almost d if he...

EFA

Because no one has defined any way in which he can actually affect a decision with this supposed conflict of interest. The whole thing is just nonsense

That's not a vfl game

He didn't play vfl games while suspended.

More fight than their side showed last week I'll grant them

Hate isn't the word. It's kind of funny and kind of sad. It's like watching someone have a mental breakdown in real time.

Wow this fail-train of a thread is still going? What an embarrassment

Except it's clearly not anything like those situations. Hocking sets the rules for the tribunal and a guy who isn't Hocking hands out the equivalent of plea deals. If the MRO doesn't actually have the power to ban players then what power do you think Hocking has? It's all very, very silly