Search results for query: *

If you haven't noticed very few of the neutrals are on your side here either.

Nothing more feral and bogan than acting like a bloke who started a fight with a dog shot from behind and then got his arse handed to him when it turned into a fair fight is somehow in the moral right. Caminiti will get weeks, but Murphy will get no sympathy.

If Murphy doesn't want to get concussions maybe he shouldn't dog shot blokes from behind and then duck into their return punch? Only has himself to blame. ****ed around and found out.

You mean the one where he tripped over his own feet? Watch the replay, you can see his left foot trip himself up.

I was being polite about it before, but since you've taken it upon yourself to be a dick for no reason, fingers crossed that tonight's unjust and ultimately meaningless win costs you a good draft pick.

Yes, because I would've looked like a bit of a dickhead if I made a thread about a pattern of umpires bottling calls in front of the home crowd in multiple games before they'd done it in multiple games, wouldn't have I? How was I supposed to make a thread about a pattern of umpiring errors...

First off, for the sake of trying to keep this thread on track rather than being accused of being a salty Port flog, I'll start by saying that the Crows played the best game they've played in years today and they did extremely well to have themselves in a position of being ahead of a previously...

Oi, whichever mod merged this post into this thread, the thread I made was not just about the Crows vs Melbourne game, it was about a wider issue that's affected multiple games this season. I'm starting my thread again. Leave it up.

First off, for the sake of trying to keep this thread on track rather than being accused of being a salty Port flog, I'll start by saying that the Crows played the best game they've played in years today and they did extremely well to have themselves in a position of being ahead of a previously...

Of course you don't, you support the only team in the league that ducks and cheats as much as the Dogs do.

Okay, how about Weightman? Happy to keep going with more examples after you say yes to him too. No, of course not. I believe the word you used to describe it is 'disciplined'. I don't believe anybody said it was. But they are the clubhouse leaders.

Are you honestly going to sit here and tell me that you don't think Toby McLean plays for frees more than the average footballer?

Unfortunately I don't think Champion Data keeps stats on cheating, but if they did then Toby McLean and Mitch Wallis would be clubhouse leaders and Cody Weightman would've been a walk-up start for the Rising Star.

If you call your entire side seemingly being coached to throw their head back at the first sign of contact to be 'disciplined', then yes, the Bulldogs are a very 'disciplined' side.

Will get a couple of weeks based on the outcome, as is standard for the AFL these days, but the head high contact was clearly an accident. Anyone in here calling a 19 year old kid a 'dog' and a 'sniper' and a 'rat' based on this incident is laughable. You North fans want to talk about a sniper...

You forgot Weightman. Been in the league for 3 games and he's already got himself a reputation.

Michael Walters is an excellent footballer but he's also a ducking diving sniping cheat.

I honestly can't believe I'm continuing to engage with somebody who's so wilfully ignoring the truth that's staring him in the face, but I guess I'll keep going. There was high contact in the images posted. That high contact was not created by incorrect tackling technique. It was created...

Several have been provided, you've just wilfully ignored them.

Gibbs cleared by the tribunal. EAD Selwood you diving cheat.

Maybe you could read the big long post with the step by step explanation accompanied by photographic evidence? If winty had made a point I would've happily addressed it. "If you think Selwood is a cheat for doing one thing, then you must think Dusty is a cheat for doing a completely different...

The lengths you people will go to to convince yourself that this massive cheat isn't a cheat are hilarious.

It was between his shoulder and the knee. Until Selwood cheated. I won't be engaging any further with you on this. The evidence is there and plain for anyone to see. You can either accept it or you can continue to lie to yourself, and based on your posting in this thread I think I know which...

His arm didn't 'slip high'. His arm is over Selwood's shoulder because Selwood deliberately shrugged his shoulder and lifted his own arm to put it there. I'm not at all surprised that you ignored the evidence after it was put in front of you, after all I predicted it in my first post, but it's...

Let's try looking at some video evidence then, shall we? At 0:15, Puopolo goes to tackle Selwood. His arm is plainly and obviously below Selwood's shoulder. Perfect tackling technique to lay a legal tackle. At 0:16, Joel Selwood lifts his own arm up above his own head. Puopolo's perfectly...

So how did Brad Hill's arm get there? You can clearly see from that photo that Selwood's arm is in between the direction that Brad Hill was coming from and his head. For Brad Hill's arm to reach Selwood's neck from that position, he would've had to ghost through Selwood's left arm. Either that...

I didn't say he was the biggest cheat in the game because of his tribunal record. This is why he's the biggest cheat in the game. (note that at the time of this graph he'd played 102 less games than the next highest free kick getter)...

Actually those are opinions. I mean, I can somewhat understand not knowing the meaning of the word monopoly, but you should at least know the meaning of the word 'wrong'.

So by your use of the word 'monopoly', you're saying that Bigfooty is the only place where people are stupid? Nobody is stupid on Facebook or Twitter? Nobody is stupid on talkback radio? Nobody is stupid on anti-vaxxer forums? Or Flat Earth Society websites? Or One Nation meetings? While having...