Search results for query: *

Two really bad decisions. Like, really bad. All in the last 5m.

Brown had eyes for the ball. Even if he’d run into his opponent it’d be play on. Incredibly brave. Very silly in terms of protecting himself. He had a bad history of this. I would have taken a running jump into his head with my eyes on the hall. See below

Menzel got molested by Jetta. No eyes for the ball.

Fair call, got the names wrong. Meant Ryan, that doesn’t change the argument at all and adds nothing to the discussion. But that’s half of what Bigfooty is so play on. Saw it happen against hooker today. Most obvious free kick there ever was. Lift your game umps.

Throughout the pages of history blokes have been given a pat on the back for running back with the flight of the ball, why? Because they know they’re going to be murdered. You have no advantage when doing this. The moment you make ANY contact with a man facing the ball it is front on contact...

Absolutely bullshit. The tackler is trying to win HTB, or force the ball from the carrier. As long as they dont get the player over the shoulder, if the ball carrier tries to stand up in the tackle and dish off to his mates, you drive that mofo in to the ground with absolute malice. If they...

Brad Scott and Damien Barrett are grubby campaigners who are ruining the game. It was the perfect tackle. Brad Scott is pissing and moaning (as usual) that his big key forward is injured, and you can't really blame him. BUT DON'T BULLSHIT ABOUT THE LEGALITY OF THE TACKLE AND FORCE UNWANTED...

Brad Scott and Damien Barrett are grubby campaigners who are ruining the game. It was the perfect tackle. Brad Scott is pissing and moaning (as usual) that his big key forward is injured, and you can't really blame him. BUT DON'T BULLSHIT ABOUT THE LEGALITY OF THE TACKLE AND FORCE UNWANTED CHANGE...