Search results for query: *

Are they though? I didnt think they were in the proper FA cup but a lower level one where they would again be closest to the highest ranked team.

Its not an underdog. They have players who are too good for the league they are playing in. They are literally the opposite of an underdog.

That can be true but would it be? Or would it just create a more attacking and exciting game? Long kicks and headers wont happen on their own. It would also come with all the deft touches, dribbles and side steps that people love as well. Plus bombing it to the penalty area from the opposition...

Especially when you consider how much the grandstands cost.

Wouldnt the game potentially be better with long balls foward in the air? Thats what we love about afl.

im not saying neutrals never get behind underdogs. It just seems to happen a lot less then in other sports. Wrexhams not an underdog. they are so cashed up compared to their competitors now its ridiculous. morocco isnt getting the love they would in other sports from neutrals.

you have dramatically, like insanely so, overestimated the cost of soccer goals.

Both of which are worth considering.

Yes

your initial example was british. This example was australian. britain is much more socially progressive then us. Plus the headline is about pointing out the racial abuse targetted at the players anyway.

In every sport neutrals go for the underdog. Except soccer. Why is this? Its effing weird. go Morocco. on top argentinas behaviour this world cup has been pathetic. Both the team and their fans. Hope they choke.

England lose on penalties and it didnt even get to a penalty shootout. classic poms.

It would be exactly the same.