Just wait, there will be some sort of half-cocked YouTube clip to “prove” it soon enough.
Losers on YouTube, bringing science down, one heavily edited and flawed video at a time.
NASA having one composite image is not proof of all pics being photoshopped. Far from it.
And FFS, do not understand the word “depth”?
Get far away from anything, and you can take a picture of it, no matter how big.
Your bolded statement is blatantly wrong.
Do you realize how fast this thing...
Yep, beaten up on the biggest bday. Out=pressured, out muscled and out scored........but but but, "there's a guy in the stands with a mic that goes to the earpieces of the Umps! And he tells them "good JOB!" when they pay a free kick!!
Of course. It's within the AFL's rights to say "If you're going to use your access to homes of millions of people, to accuse this establishment of cheating via umpiring, you have no business in being a part of this game and it's affiliations".
Fair enough, I would have thought.
Yeah, I've been sent here by Gil. He's paying me and many others with a slice of the money he received from Richmond premiership merchandise that's been sold through each AFL shop.
This is simply a lie.
It’s fanciful bullshit.
Tinfoilhat.jpeg
Half correct. They saw Ballantyne run directly at a player who was nowhere near the ball, looking over his shoulder, check him, and they paid a free for off the ball contact to make a statement early in the match.
You don’t get...
I think it’s a video made by design, highlighting free kicks for one team only without any context or critical thinking.
No different to the crackpots who sit in their basement and make videos about the earth being flat with handpicked pictures they’ve found on google.
It’s not evidence of...
The Hawthorn player is running away from the ball carrier looking over his shoulder and Ballantyne runs directly at him to check him.
Contact is made and the unsuspecting player goes down.
I know you’re one of the biggest crackpots on this site who thinks the AFL is out to get the...
Firstly, the umpires don't say to themselves "is this worth a goal", they see an incident in front of them and say "is that a free kick?", and they make a split second decision.
There's no convincing people like you that umpires pay free kicks that they see, and miss others that they don't. And...
"I don't really have an argument against the fact that Ballantyne is well known around the league for niggling off the ball, but I'll trail in behind someone else's argument and try really hard to claim the upper hand"
It shows they know that Ballantyne is a predictable and inflammatory little cockbag, who they were ready for early in the game, and who they paid a free against so that the expectation was set. It was good umpiring in the circumstances, because otherwise Ballantyne would've tried that s**t on...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.