Search results for query: *

Remove this Banner Ad

  1. Seeds

    Jimmy Bartel vs Simon Black

    bartel is a tad overrated. Didnt get as much out of his career as he should have. simon black is battling it out with adam goodes as the most overrated player of all time.
  2. Seeds

    Jimmy Bartel vs Simon Black

    You think black could play a marking role in the foward line, tag or go down to defence to be third man up? have we all forgotton who black was? He was as one dimensional as tony lockett.
  3. Seeds

    Moved Thread Neutral fans: Hawkins or Riewoldt?

    We were just talking about a single game in regards to hawkins. There was no mention of riewoldt. and hawkins spent about 7 seasons as our sole key tall.
  4. Seeds

    Moved Thread Neutral fans: Hawkins or Riewoldt?

    Which is odd given richmond have double the supporters dont they?
  5. Seeds

    Moved Thread Neutral fans: Hawkins or Riewoldt?

    Their stats are remarkably similar. Eerily so in fact.
  6. Seeds

    Moved Thread Neutral fans: Hawkins or Riewoldt?

    And yet the poll in this thread has hawkins with double the votes despite it being started by a cats supporter.
  7. Seeds

    Moved Thread Neutral fans: Hawkins or Riewoldt?

    Yeah we lost pods early in the match so he was the only tall in the foward line and took multiple defenders.
  8. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    In what season did pendlebury have an impact on the team that was like dangerfields 2016 and 2017?
  9. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    so what answer were you looking for then? you complain about a lack of scientific analysis and then mock the very concept of it.
  10. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    beep wrong. Its completely based off scientific observation. if you take 1000 players who play out their careers to they retire voluntarially their peak perfromance is almost always between 25-29.
  11. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    He peaked at 23-25. Which is well before every other mids peak which is usually around 25-29. but its not only that he peaked earlier but his form fell away during the 25-29 period. he wasnt as good. And the difference was swan was gone, and your assertion that pendlebury was better then swan...
  12. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Pendleburys best seasons were all when swan was still playing despite the fact pendlebury hadnt hit his peak midfield years. Then with swan gone pendleburys form goes backwards rather then keeps getting better as you would expect.
  13. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Please dont be an idiot and focus on a single game played against different opponents and different periods of their career. Danger was a shadow of his peak in 2020. go look at hirds 2000 grand final vs 2001. Now imagine he only played one of them. pendlebury wasnt even the best midfielder in...
  14. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Its a popularity contest. No one that is actually evaluating the best player.
  15. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    But is that an error in thinking. we all think pendlebury has been elite for much longer but dangers 8 all australians vs pendleburys 6 suggests otherwise. Are we wrong in our thinking. Collingwood gets all the attention in the media whilst dangers career in adelaide did not. pendlebury is...
  16. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    so selwood three times the player of pendlebury. got it. dont be so stupid.
  17. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Lethality on his quest to have geelong play 22 away games every year. 13 is just not enough. keep it in your head. Its delusional.
  18. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Danger 8 all australians. Pendlebury only 6. how does that fit with the pendlebury has longevity story?
  19. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    How did geelong make the grand final in 2019 without its home ground advantage?
  20. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    AFL MVP. Oh wait danger has that too. Not pendlebury. all australians, pendlebury 6. Dangerfield 8. wait, isnt pendlebury the one who is supposed to have longevity. Why does danger have more all australians?
  21. Seeds

    Patrick Dangerfield or Scott Pendlebury?

    Pendleburys peak was lower. At no point has pendlebury ever been the best player in the comp. Nor even the second best. Dangerfield was in the best 2 players in the comp for about 4 seasons.
  22. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Yep better then dermie. but not at the same level as Lockett, Ablett and Carey.
  23. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Yep theyre huge jumps. He totally is getting off the ground there. Totally refutes my point.
  24. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Awesome. Here we go. Extremely rare footage of piggy jumping. Let’s see them.
  25. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Lol that’s really the best you could find?
  26. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Dermie could jump. dunstall could not.
  27. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    No player symbolised the eighties more than dermie. A true character of the game who probably isn’t remembered as highly as he should be.
  28. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    I like Piggy. I just don’t rate him as good as the others. but I probably still overrate him cos he played better against Geelong then he did against other teams. If I followed another team he didn’t do as well against i would probably rate him even less. best key fowards I have seen In order...
  29. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    woukdnt that fact make me rate him better then he actually was?
  30. Seeds

    Dunstall or Dermie

    Dunstall is behind all of Lockett, Ablett, Carey. there were genuine freaks of the game. dunstall was just a man. Who could not take a pack mark. He would be no champion in the modern game given how flooded defences are. probably just another Tom hawkins.
Back
Top