Brad Miller

[Goldust]

Fact is we are far better when he's in.
People carry on like he is 35 when he's actually 28!
Good form must be rewarded even if your name rhymes with plane ruck or something.
Poor form must be punished also.
Regardless of this theme of blokes not being part of the future(biggest bullshit piece of spin ever) listed players who are current and in form should play.It defies logic and has absolutely blown up in our face.I bet Hardwick and his silly red haired mate are too scared to play Tuck now because it will expose them as the dills they have been.

And further to this ridiculous part of the future them it is just as possible that a 19-24year old stealing games is just as likely not part of the future too because he is a rubbish player as evidenced down at Punt Road but hey let's just keep "developing" rubbish. We might end up with a full tip.

WOULD also be helpful if they gave Tuck a decent run too, none of this bring him in, plonk him on the bench for three quarters as the sub, give him a quarter and then banish him back to Coburg!
Silliness!

 

[THE THIN MAN]

WOULD also be helpful if they gave Tuck a decent run too, none of this bring him in, plonk him on the bench for three quarters as the sub, give him a quarter and then banish him back to Coburg!
Silliness!

Tuck should not have played that game as he was coming back from injured ribs

 

[rammbo]

The year is a rite off so id like to see games given to only players that r gunna b there next year and a bit of experimenting eg game plan reiwolt CHB Post ff vick bulk rucking,rance midfield ,just f..kn try afew things.

 

[mitch richmond]

The usual playing of favourites, Tigerland!
Some people simply didn't want him at the club and aren't going to be a fan no matter what he brings to the table, yet they'll delve in hypotheticals re the potential gretaness of players like Griffiths and Post.
It's simple, our structure is superior with him involved .. play him!
Not sure why we want to write off every player who turns 26 or older!
A list of players a lot of Richmond fans wouldn't have at the club because of age ... Adam Goodes, Robert Murphy, Joel Corey, Dustin Fletcher, Brad Ottens, Matthew Pavlich, Simon Black, Brent Harvey, Lenny Hayes, Heath Scotland, Chris Tarrant, Matthew Scarlett.
I'm sure they'd all fill a hole!

 

[Madtiger2006]

Fact is we are far better when he's in.

We were playing better because our midfield could run out games. Nothing to do with Miller. We're worse with him in the side

 

[Rodney Dangerfield]

We were playing better because our midfield could run out games. Nothing to do with Miller. We're worse with him in the side

MT if you can provide proof for my why that's the case I'm happy to go with it but until otherwise my eyes tell me that our forward line functions better with him there.
Much better.
Do I think he is the long term answer? Obviously not but blokes like he and Tuck rotting away in the twos in a terrible side like Richmond is stupid.We are not Collingwood.