Carazzo

[Wavell]

Will he stay on the list do you think
IMO showed enough in his two games to suggest so.

 

[ryan2000]

I hope he does. He should have had 10 games to his name i reckon. He had a great year in the two's. What a suprise packet he's been.

He's got some great skills to. You never really got a good look at em in the games he did play in, but hell be in our starting side next year i think!

 

[shacka]

I would have though so. He showed some great form in patches (esp the Melbourne game).

Seems like "Pagan's sort of player" as well, could help free skinny into the forward line.

 

[Kooley]

Both him and Bentick deserve to be elevated. If not he is still eligible to stay on the rookie list. Remember we also have to make a decision on Sentanta. Do we elevate him next year or keep him on the rookie list for another year? With his injury mid-season he apperas to have been forgotten about.

 

[shacka]

Both him and Bentick deserve to be elevated. If not he is still eligible to stay on the rookie list. Remember we also have to make a decision on Sentanta. Do we elevate him next year or keep him on the rookie list for another year? With his injury mid-season he apperas to have been forgotten about.

i would have thought Setanta would go back to the rookie list. Bentick and Carazzo have shown enough to be elevated. another year for Setanta isn't unfair, it'll help his game and it's likely he'll get another chance to be promoted in 2005.

 

[Teagueeee15]

Definatly should,
In the 2 games he did play, his performances on Davey as well as Didak/Davis were really good.