So forcing someone to take a vaccine, against their will, that they may very produce antibodies for anyway..Most of us could be immune already.
how is this ok?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So forcing someone to take a vaccine, against their will, that they may very produce antibodies for anyway..Most of us could be immune already.
No one should be forced to be vaccinated.So forcing someone to take a vaccine, against their will, that they may very produce antibodies for anyway..
how is this ok?
Gangsta negotiator!!No one should be forced to be vaccinated.
‘’But you have no right of complaint if you can not work in a field that requires vaccination.
The choice is free, but there are consequences for whichever choice you make.
In reality though when is a choice ever free? virtually every choice comes with a price. eat meat accept that an animal will be processed, eat vegetables accept land was cleared for the venture, don't eat you die. There is no such thing as choice without consequence.Gangsta negotiator!!
That’s not a free choice now is it?
And who gets to choose whether you require vaccination epidemiologist or employer?
Hahaha philosophical answer which leads to existential crisis..In reality though when is a choice ever free? virtually every choice comes with a price. eat meat accept that an animal will be processed, eat vegetables accept land was cleared for the venture, don't eat you die. There is no such thing as choice without consequence.
Gangsta negotiator!!
That’s not a free choice now is it?
And who gets to choose whether you require vaccination epidemiologist or employer?
Welcome to the real world.Gangsta negotiator!!
That’s not a free choice now is it?
And who gets to choose whether you require vaccination epidemiologist or employer?
Jimmah Hird loves this..Welcome to the real world.
I have been having mandatory vaccines for 40 years dues to my work. It is simple, if I don’t want the vaccine, I am free to gain employment elsewhere.
Comes down to if you want to keep working there i suspect, i work in an essential service, i would hazard a guess this is a decision i are likely going to be presented with in the near future.Hahaha philosophical answer which leads to existential crisis..
but who gets the choice over you?
Do you leave it up to the employer..
Melbourne City Council has just announced all Moomba activities cancelled. Parade, carnival, water skiing, birdman rally etc etc.
Good, scab festival, may it rot in hell.
‘Moomba 2.0’ to go ahead after cancellation
There is new hope a decision to cancel the iconic festival for the first time in its history will be overturned.
Basically, what I told you folks a week ago.
Andrews, Sutton, Tabloids etc., are full of sh*t.
View attachment 1061409
I don't really care for sutton either way, and you need to stop trying to tell others what they do or don't believe. On topic, Gupta has been a herd immunity proponent since day dot, so I'm not really surprised she came to this conclusion. Perhaps she is also looking for science to match her views rather than the other way around?I told people 5 ****ing weeks that the U.K. strain was a manufactured piece of bullshit, not because someone else claimed it, but because I understand the actual science myself. It has now been supported by an outright elite member in this field, who happens to also know the actual science at play here..
Brett Sutton is not fit to prescribe aspirin, much less act as an authority on epidemiology. He's literally clueless.
Basically, I am smarter than the entire political bureaucracy that YOU support.
Perhaps she is also looking for science to match her views rather than the other way around?
So forcing someone to take a vaccine, against their will, that they may very produce antibodies for anyway..
how is this ok?
I told people 5 ****ing weeks ago that the U.K. strain was a manufactured piece of bullshit, not because someone else claimed it, but because I understand the actual science myself. It has now been supported by an outright elite member in this field, who happens to also know the actual science at play here..
Brett Sutton is not fit to prescribe aspirin, much less act as an authority on epidemiology. He's literally clueless.
Basically, I am smarter than the entire political bureaucracy that YOU support.
If you had a real clue about science you would know that this claim is counterintuitive to how an actual scientist conducts themselves.
We are not talking about postmodernist auto-ethnographic arts degree level woo woo bullshit here.
Properly trained scientists go through years of rigorous training in a thing called "The Scientific Method", which is the greatest filter of human bias ever invented by the human race.
A scientist is actually trained to first identify phenomena via experimentation under rigorous methodological protocols, and then undertake a prolonged process to prove their initial findings wrong, until they reach a conclusion that the research is either flawed and dismissed, or will stand up under peer review and is fit to be published. Ego is the enemy of the scientist.
Your little exercise in C grade intellectual monkey wrenching only serves to highlight your own ignorance.
.We are not talking about postmodernist auto-ethnographic arts degree level woo woo bullshit here.
Properly trained scientists go through years of rigorous training in a thing called "The Scientific Method", which is the greatest filter of human bias ever invented by the human race.
A scientist is actually trained to first identify phenomena via experimentation under rigorous methodological protocols, and then undertake a prolonged process to prove their initial findings wrong, until they reach a conclusion that the research is either flawed and dismissed, or will stand up under peer review and is fit to be published. Ego is the enemy of the scientist.
.
This is true. Although in my experience, some scientists do wade outside their area of expertise and I have seen Gupta do this.
Her modelling on infection rates etc. is to be respected, but I recall in mid-late 2020 she threw her hat in the economics ring with some pretty serious statements that had very, very little scientific analysis put into them.
A good thing for all scientists to remember is that they need to know their limitations. I experienced this first hand at a conference where an expert on nutrient timing in muscle protein synthesis got absolutely shredded because he stepped outside of his domain and into the domain of another panellist, being lean muscle mass preservation during caloric deficits. It was hard to watch an ego certainly for involved then and there.