- Joined
- Oct 17, 2007
- Posts
- 5,417
- Reaction score
- 4,311
- Location
- Cultural Marxist Utopia
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Banned
- #451
Most of his victims were male but that hasn't stopped the lemmings wasting their time discussing misogyny and assorted nonsense.And having the guy stab half his victims is the obvious way to achieve it.
The story could be anything, all that matters is what the media focuses on, and they are focusing on the guns. And 'mental health'.
Why? Because mandatory 'mental health' checks for gunowners is a giant stride towards greater gun control. A new bill to legislate 'restraining orders' based on 'tipoffs' regardoing 'mental health' from 'friends and family' is a blatant attempt to make it 'legal' and easy to confiscate innocent peoples guns. An obvious attack on the second amendment.
The narrative is that this guy was 'mentally unhealthy' and this event could have been avoided if the government had more powers. California already has the toughest gun ownership laws in the country. What other powers could the government want? Think through this:
Just wait until the gov/msm start telling the zombifed baby boomers that if their kids or other family members question the government's story about 911, 'school shootings' etc that they might be 'mentally unhealthy'."The proposed legislation would create a gun violence restraining order, establishing a system where concerned family members, intimate partners or friends can notify law enforcement of someone who is demonstrating a propensity to commit violence toward themselves or others," reads a statement on the websites for both lawmakers.
The legislators say when family members would notify law enforcement, there would be a tool to "potentially prohibit the purchase of firearms and/or remove the firearms already in possession."





not sure why, but i like you
could be the hawks thing, could be coz you're around my age, not sure!