Final Ladder For Sanfl 2004

[go uuu dogs]

CENTRALS 18-2
EAGLES 15-5
SOUTH 15-5
WEST 14-6

STURT 14-6
PORT 12-8
NORWOOD 12-8
NORTH 9-11
GLENELG 7-13

GRAND FINAL CENTRALS V SOUTH DOGS BY 57 POINTS

 

[RoosterWedgie]

North 20-0
Norwood 17-3
Centrals 15-5
Glenelg 10-10

Port 10-10 (after tying exactly with Glenelg on % they lost a toss of a coin)
South 7-13
West 6-14
Egles 5-15
Sturt 0-20

I'm pretty sure none of that would add up though!

 

[sapaul]

Originally posted by go uuu dogs
CENTRALS 18-2
EAGLES 15-5
SOUTH 15-5
WEST 14-6

STURT 14-6
PORT 12-8
NORWOOD 12-8
NORTH 9-11
GLENELG 7-13

There is only 90 games in a season, how come you have it as 116?

 

[go uuu dogs]

23 ROUNDS 3 BYES PER CLUB 20 GAMES PER TEAM

 

[Uncle Steve]

Originally posted by RoosterWedgie
Glenelg 10-10

Port 10-10 (after tying exactly with Glenelg on % they lost a toss of a coin)

Would be sweeter if both were 10-9-1, with the draw caused by a game which had to be abandoned when the Alberton oval goal post snapped...

 

[go uuu dogs]

it was very funny at the reserves grand final when a port player hit the post while going for goal and i yelled out quick port duck and cover

 

[Thunderstruck]

Centrals 18 -2
Sturt 15-5
Port 13-7
West 12-8

Eagles 11-9
South 9-11
Norwood 7-13
Glenelg 6-14
North 3-17

Grand Final, Centrals to beat Sturt by 25 points.

 

[naughty monkey]

Originally posted by go uuu dogs
CENTRALS 18-2
EAGLES 15-5
SOUTH 15-5
WEST 14-6

STURT 14-6
PORT 12-8
NORWOOD 12-8
NORTH 9-11
GLENELG 7-13

GRAND FINAL CENTRALS V SOUTH DOGS BY 57 POINTS

Originally posted by sapaul

There is only 90 games in a season, how come you have it as 116?

Originally posted by go uuu dogs

23 ROUNDS 3 BYES PER CLUB 20 GAMES PER TEAM

Correct uuu dogs, in that each club will play 20 matches.
But your ladder is impossible.

If you add up your wins you get 116, but the losses only add up to 64!
sapaul was making the point that both should add up to 90, as that is the total number of matches played in the home and away season.

fwiw, no-one else's suggestions are possible either.

 

[Thunderstruck]

My wins and losses are a bit off too but the ladder positions are the ones that are right.

 

[go uuu dogs]

Re: Re: Final Ladder For Sanfl 2004

Originally posted by naughty monkey
Correct uuu dogs, in that each club will play 20 matches.
But your ladder is impossible.

If you add up your wins you get 116, but the losses only add up to 64!
sapaul was making the point that both should add up to 90, as that is the total number of matches played in the home and away season.

fwiw, no-one else's suggestions are possible either.

yeah well you get the idea on a the final ladder standings

 

[sa-afl blues]

Like most of you I can't wait to for sanfl 2004 to start this is how I think the ladder will be come the first week of september 2004

Central 17-3 ( with there depth how can you see them decline)
Sturt 15-5 (based on their one good year one bad year theme which has gone on for the last few years this should be a good year for the men from unley)
Port 14-6 ( after this years finnish port should improve for their first finals apperance in three years boo hoo)
West 13-7 (will be up there again)

Eagles 10-10 ( will be unlucky but will loose alot of close games)
South 8-12 ( look for south to improve under Pyman, finals 2005)
Norwood 7-13 ( Sorry Redlegs fans cant see much improvment)
Glenelg 4-16 ( perhaps I am being harsh could improve, lost alot of games last year after leading at half time, just wondering where all their good players from 19's 17's go?
North 1-20 ( not even jars can save this miserable outfit)

 

[RoosterWedgie]

Originally posted by sa-afl blues
North 1-20 ( not even jars can save this miserable outfit)

Geez we'll be going bad with 20 losses and 1 win in a 20 game season or do you give us credit for winning one of the byes?