Hawthorns Win Means Nothing

[Johnny_Segment]

All and sundry were told that Hawthorn getting within 2 goals of Geelong in Round 17 meant absolutely nothing because they were missing Ablett & Ling, plus Chapman for a half. How then can this GF win mean anything when they had 21 players go missing for the game?

22 guys in Brown & Gold vs 1 Bald sook in Blue & White. Until Hawthorn can beat a full Geelong side, I guess we remain pretenders.

 

[superstar]

You mean two bald sooks.

McLaren played a ripper for the Cats.

 

[29-little-CHAMP]

Hawk's well done on winning the flag ....

Through the year , i have had a crack at you guy's .......

Other club's will now look at the way you have built your club and take your lead ...

*Frankston Rover = did you watch the bronlow count ch 10 ?

Before each round they showed highligths of that round .

A. Hudson did the voice overs ....... 3 times over the night he had a crack at the hawk's
(A.Clarkson) copped it in the neck ... this bloke was trying to put presure on you guys ... or am I reading to much into it ?

1) having a go at the reporter.
2) saying about the umpire in the Geelong game.
3) crows game showing Clarkson going off in the box .

 

[Frankston Rover]

Yeah I watched the count.

 

[29-little-CHAMP]

Am I reading to much into it ?

 

[whatimtalkingbout]

Hawks would've won by a lot if the umpires didn't do their best for the Cats. Not to mention losing two players, not including Bateman for a bit, too.

I think we're all relieved that the umps didn't influence the outcome of the Grand Final. Everybody wins.

 

[huggy_b]

Am I reading to much into it ?

.ʇı oʇuı ɥɔnɯ oʇ ʎɐɐɐɐɐɐɐɐʍ buıpɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ ʞuıɥʇ ı

 

[Neville Bartos]

We could post thousands of threads about statements regarding Hawthorn that were proven wrong on Saturday, but I'd rather just sit back and enjoy the best win in living memory.