MRP / Trib. MRP and Tribunal - 2024 - Rd 5 - Charlie Cameron 1 week?

Remove this Banner Ad

MRO probably thought Heeney's hit on Hind was deserved considering he tried to take off Chad's head with his elbow at full force

That should be weeks, its AFL not the UFC for *s sakes lol
 

Log in to remove this ad.

MRO probably thought Heeney's hit on Hind was deserved considering he tried to take off Chad's head with his elbow at full force

That should be weeks, its AFL not the UFC for *s sakes lol
Heeney appears to be able to do whatever he wants without repercussion, remember this doozy from recent times?



"The AFL has cleared Essendon’s Brandon Zerk-Thatcher of any wrongdoing in the off-the-ball incident which cost Sydney Swans’ star Isaac Heeney a broken hand.

The gun goal kicker was caught up in a behind the play push-and-shove with the Essendon defender in the second term on Thursday night when Heeney sustained the injury.

Thats right , zerk thatcher had to be cleared by the tribunal for heeney breaking his hand while punching zerk in the face.
 
Why Isn't Frampton up on rough conduct for his hit on Higgins?
a good old-fashioned charge ( which used to be reportable) if I ever saw one, zero play on the ball and far more potential than Max's to cause injury. quite staggered it hasn't even been mentioned

1:30 in

 
Shocked Heeney didn't get cited for striking as that was pretty clear cut.

Also shocked that Hind didn't even get a fine for attempted striking when he legit threw an elbow at Warner's head.
 
Stupid by heeney and papley, now other teams know how soft they are, they can expect more attention

57559a30c6be6b44812516b1f516ce8e.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Shocked Heeney didn't get cited for striking as that was pretty clear cut.

Also shocked that Hind didn't even get a fine for attempted striking when he legit threw an elbow at Warner's head.
i dont get the Hind one. Clear elbow, just because he misses he's ok.
Heeney....well.....$$$ and all. sometimes you can strike the face, sometimes you can't.
 
There is no clear guidelines on how the MRO grade impact ..... it just a guess and tool the MRO use for their own convenience to give certain players weeks off and others a free pass

The velocity impact of the Frampton and also the Draper hit were a lot higher than King's who glanced Macrae's noggin yet one player isn't cited, one is cited as low impact and one as medium .... both Frampton and Draper's hits (both intentional) had the potential to cause serious injury even if they were only to the body ..... in all 3 cases the players hit were fine and played the matches out without issue but only player looks like receiving a suspension (and his was graded careless and not intentional)

The MRO is a mess ...... Christian has to go
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Doesnt matter.
Afl rules are hit the head away from the play = intentional.
No, the AFL rules are: Intentional conduct A Player intentionally commits a Classifiable Offence if the Player engages in the conduct constituting the Reportable Offence with the intention of committing that offence. An intention is a state of mind. Intention may be formed on the spur of the moment. The issue is whether it existed at the time at which the Player engaged in the conduct.

So no, under the laws of the game, intentional doesn't apply because Heeney wasn't intentionally trying to hit Hind in the head as Redman was last week.
 
No, the AFL rules are: Intentional conduct A Player intentionally commits a Classifiable Offence if the Player engages in the conduct constituting the Reportable Offence with the intention of committing that offence. An intention is a state of mind. Intention may be formed on the spur of the moment. The issue is whether it existed at the time at which the Player engaged in the conduct.

So no, under the laws of the game, intentional doesn't apply because Heeney wasn't intentionally trying to hit Hind in the head as Redman was last week.
Redman hit his upper chest/shoulder and slid up to his face, so wasnt intending to hit him in the head, doesnt matter off ball head hit is intentional, who are we kidding heeney can do whatever he likes
 
At the tribunal for Sicily's case, the AFL lawyer tried to argue that he deserved a week because of potential for injury. When pressed what injury could have been caused, she said it had potential to bruise.

Interestingly, seems like Hind's flying elbow doesn't have the same kind of potential for injury!
 
At the tribunal for Sicily's case, the AFL lawyer tried to argue that he deserved a week because of potential for injury. When pressed what injury could have been caused, she said it had potential to bruise.

Interestingly, seems like Hind's flying elbow doesn't have the same kind of potential for injury!
This is why it's so bad for the game to have lawyers involved and leading the way.

The really encourage the AFL to disappear up it's own ass with rules and conditions and inconsistent rulings.
 
View attachment 1940423

Of course you use the still of him hitting his face, heres the start of it
...You think that's him trying to hit Newcombe on the shoulder? Even if we accept that the initial contact is when the absolute bottom of the hand grazes Newcombes shoulder on the way through to hitting him, his intention wasn't to flick the top of Newcombe's shoulder. That's a much easier case for intentional than throwing a hand behind you at your chest height.
 
...You think that's him trying to hit Newcombe on the shoulder? Even if we accept that the initial contact is when the absolute bottom of the hand grazes Newcombes shoulder on the way through to hitting him, his intention wasn't to flick the top of Newcombe's shoulder. That's a much easier case for intentional than throwing a hand behind you at your chest height.
i think his intention was to shove him in the chest, you can clearly see that in the still, 30 degree day, lots of sweat, the push goes high, simples
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top