Poll - Who would you rate as the weakest premiership side in the AFL era?

Which premiership team would you rate as the weakest of the AFL era?

  • Collingwood 1990

    Votes: 64 4.2%
  • Hawthorn 1991

    Votes: 4 0.3%
  • West Coast 92-94

    Votes: 3 0.2%
  • Essendon 1993

    Votes: 73 4.7%
  • Carlton 1995

    Votes: 16 1.0%
  • North 96-99

    Votes: 18 1.2%
  • Adelaide 97-98

    Votes: 126 8.2%
  • Essendon 2000

    Votes: 34 2.2%
  • Brisbane 2001-2003

    Votes: 3 0.2%
  • Port 2004

    Votes: 40 2.6%
  • Sydney 2005

    Votes: 35 2.3%
  • West Coast 2006

    Votes: 13 0.8%
  • Geelong 2007-2011

    Votes: 14 0.9%
  • Hawthorn 2008

    Votes: 28 1.8%
  • Collingwood 2010

    Votes: 26 1.7%
  • Sydney 2012

    Votes: 13 0.8%
  • Hawthorn 2013-2015

    Votes: 25 1.6%
  • Bulldogs 2016

    Votes: 494 32.1%
  • Richmond 2017

    Votes: 509 33.1%

  • Total voters
    1,538

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

You're a mod bumping a thread that hasn't been posted in, in a year?

Pull your head out and go celebrate your ******* flag.

Found someone who voted for Richmond
 
How anyone can not vote for the crows 97/98 is amazing to me. Literally only won coz the rules of finals were BS, they came 5th lost and got a second chance. Would not have been premiers in 2019. Never top four in home and away
 
My apologies to Richmond 2017 I was clearly wrong as lots of people were, still don't think these Tigers teams are up with the upper echelon as the comp is pretty weak at the top end now with equalisation but they clearly aren't the weakest as many voted.
 
Need to change the poll to 'Richmond 2017-19'.

But yeh, 508 people who know f*** all about football.
 
My apologies to Richmond 2017 I was clearly wrong as lots of people were, still don't think these Tigers teams are up with the upper echelon as the comp is pretty weak at the top end now with equalisation but they clearly aren't the weakest as many voted.

If the upper teams are 'weaker' because the comp is more equal then that makes winning flags more impressive not less
 
My apologies to Richmond 2017 I was clearly wrong as lots of people were, still don't think these Tigers teams are up with the upper echelon as the comp is pretty weak at the top end now with equalisation but they clearly aren't the weakest as many voted.
Using that argument the 'bottom' teams are now stronger, so it's harder to win against them, yes?
 
Richmond get 19 games in a row at the G, beat an inexperienced Brisbane, a Scott led Geelong team who couldn’t beat witches hats in finals, and then beat up on an inexperienced GWS, and somehow think this proves they are a great team? lol
 
Back
Top