- Joined
- Sep 13, 2013
- Posts
- 31,411
- Reaction score
- 28,207
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Juventus
Mayne must be pretty Crap IF Blair gets a Game over Mayne.
Gubby must be a Terrible Picker of Players
Mayne is pretty crap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

WB v ADE · GEE v GCS · MEL v ESS · NM v WCE · PA v SYD · RIC v BL · StK v GWS ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
Mayne must be pretty Crap IF Blair gets a Game over Mayne.
Gubby must be a Terrible Picker of Players
So Stringer and Cloke were the best tall forwards out there. OK.
Cloke had 14 touches and kicked a goal, Stringer had similar figures 4 times in a row last year and got dropped.... one down three to go....
Um Stringer took more marks, more marks inside 50, had more tackles and had more scoring shots and no-one even mentions him....
At least he provided a great chop out in the ruck for Boyd....
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Maybe you just watch the games instead of quote figures...
But managed to get in the 2010 side, almost automatic selection, in a side that had very few injuries ?He may be a premiership player, but he is also not even of AFL standard. He is short, slow, makes many poor decisions, has ordinary skills, overthinks everything he does and gets caught or mis-disposes the ball, doesn't kick goals and doesn't stick tackles. He is as you rightly suggest less than perfect.
Mayne is pretty crap
Based on TD's logic he is given Blair was selected ahead of him, but based on everything I've seen of him. He's just a limited player. His game last night was ok, kicked a goal and layed some tackles. But as a pressure player the Bulldogs defenders stepped him and or ran away from him with ease, His disposals were ok nothing special doesn't really crash packs and doesn't really pose a threat at ground level. Kinda looks like Maccaffer out there.Based on his last Collingwood game?

Lol at the Kirby talk. He kicked 4 in a vfl practice match. Afl would be 4 times harder.
I don't have a problem with that, but the rest I do. Another thing that boggles me is h's pretty slow for sub 180cm player.
I am half way through the replay and would probably give White as much praise as Cloke for his first 2 qtrs. Cloke is not really 'that' good, but he gives the Bulldogs solidity in the forward line which we lacked through Moore and Cox. Stringer only gets one goal for the match and it's the smaller forwards who kick all the goals. I don't understand all the hate for White. His mobility and height sometimes work well together.So Stringer and Cloke were the best tall forwards out there. OK.
I am half way through the replay and would probably give White as much praise as Cloke for his first 2 qtrs. Cloke is not really 'that' good, but he gives the Bulldogs solidity in the forward line which we lacked through Moore and Cox. Stringer only gets one goal for the match and it's the smaller forwards who kick all the goals. I don't understand all the hate for White. His mobility and height sometimes work well together.
Ps....I know there'll be an amendment somewhere in the constitution (18C??) that encourages internet giants to harrass other people with immunity, just once I'd like to see the marquis of queensbury rules enacted in its place!
May be so, but that's not saying much for any key forward.I don't think anyone here wants to acknowledge that Cloke was the best tall forward on the ground. He wasn't fantastic but he did his job. Apart from White, our tall forwards were well held. The bulldogs don't need a dominant forward - they just need someone to be a target and play a role. Cloke did that and Moore and Cox didn't.

I have since watched the replay - you may have seen my half time update on the big forwards. There wasn't an outstanding big forward on the ground. The medium and smaller forwards did all the damage. I don't really see how you can compare Mayne and Cloke given the different roles they played. But Mayne was good enough to get a game ahead of Blair next week.May be so, but that's not saying much for any key forward.
It was just a game for Cloke.
But as it was against us the media will ofcourse go on about it.
I think we can agree Mayne was bagged a bit. I thought he was ok actually. Just a game.
Cloke v Mayne on Friday night.
Their respective afl super coach scores were 71 v 72.
Mayne had 13 disposals Cloke had 14 disposals.
Cloke 1 goal
Mayne 1 goal (and behind)
Cloke 6 marks
Mayne 4 marks
Cloke 1 tackle (still a bit low on those by old mate)
Mayne 5 tackles.
Funny thing, people laugh at Mayne, and old mate just plodded on.
Give Cloke his due, he kicks long, but he's become a good tall plodder.
So Mayne to me had a plodding game too![]()
White cops it a bit too much.I have since watched the replay - you may have seen my half time update on the big forwards. There wasn't an outstanding big forward on the ground. The medium and smaller forwards did all the damage. I don't really see how you can compare Mayne and Cloke given the different roles they played. But Mayne was good enough to get a game ahead of Blair next week.
Our crowded forward line was frustrating to watch and certainly worked against the success of a key forward. Cloke probably enjoyed the luxury of floating around open territory plucking the odd mark and bombing long. As usual his long bombs into the forward line missed a target. His best work was the short pass to assist a goal and his team lifting goal in the 1st qtr.
Cloke wasn't that good, but he played a role and looked solid. With the benefit of a replay, I thought White played better on the night, but he is not really being asked to play as a key forward.