NWO/Illuminati Terrorism for dummies

Remove this Banner Ad

Or simply accept more or less everything the government tells you is a lie.

I'll take Box D thanks Burgo.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

medusala said:
Or simply accept more or less everything the government tells you is a lie.

I'll take Box D thanks Burgo.
Click to expand...
Black mob for thousands of years in a part of SA had this story about this yellow lizard buried in the ground.The story went that if you dig him up he'd get angry and his revenge would probably mean the end of humanity (this time around)

This story scared the s**t out of people for thousands of years. Turns out theres no lizard, BHP found that out when they dug out the uranium (yellow cake) for Fukishima and other places.

It's not the point of this post to point out that Fukishima could be the end of Japan..
 
rayven said:
Black mob for thousands of years in a part of SA had this story about this yellow lizard buried in the ground.The story went that if you dig him up he'd get angry and his revenge would probably mean the end of humanity (this time around)

This story scared the s**t out of people for thousands of years. Turns out theres no lizard, BHP found that out when they dug out the uranium (yellow cake) for Fukishima and other places.

It's not the point of this post to point out that Fukishima could be the end of Japan..
Click to expand...
And Julia Gillard weighs exactly the same as a duck........You know what that means.;)
 
From your neck of the woods meds:

http://rt.com/news/woolwich-snoopers-charter-murder-811/
UK Home Secretary Theresa May said on Sunday that it is “essential” to grant intelligence agencies the capacity to access communications data, despite overwhelming opposition to the Draft Communications Data Bill, first published last year.
Click to expand...

...and this quote makes a very salient point:
“It is remarkable for politicians to be jumping to legislation to monitor the entire country when all the evidence to date shows this horrific attack would not have been prevented by the communications data bill,” said Emma Carr of the UK’s Big Brother Watch in a statement released on Sunday.
Carr added that the law would hinder, rather than enhance anti-terror operations: It “would divert resources from focused surveillance operations at a time when the agencies are already struggling to cope with the volume of information available,” she said.
Click to expand...
 
DivideandMultiply said:
...and this quote makes a very salient point:
Click to expand...

Disgraceful.

Another clueless pollie. She cant even deport a terrorist.

As is recent snooping on phone records in US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-06/white-house-defends-its-wiretapping-millions-us-citizens

Blink and you have likely missed Obama's latest Watergate moment, this time following the disclosure that the White House has instructed the NSA to collect millions of daily phone records from Verizon (and likely all other carriers).
 
medusala said:
Disgraceful.

Another clueless pollie. She cant even deport a terrorist.

As is recent snooping on phone records in US.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-06/white-house-defends-its-wiretapping-millions-us-citizens

Blink and you have likely missed Obama's latest Watergate moment, this time following the disclosure that the White House has instructed the NSA to collect millions of daily phone records from Verizon (and likely all other carriers).
Click to expand...
Thats been known for years.

Anyone communicating anything illegal via phones these days is a moron and deserves to be caught tbh.

Not that i agree with it.
 
J_Moore said:
Having access to everyone's phone call metadata is massive government overreach, but it's not "wire tapping", and it is not helpful to label it as such.
Click to expand...

Didn't they tap Associated Press's phones?

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/15/opinion/navarrette-obama-administration-secrecy

The Justice Department was interested in the conversations of anyone who worked on a May 7, 2012, story about the CIA thwarting a terrorist plot in Yemen. The administration wanted to know who was leaking information to the AP, so rather than monitor the phone lines of its own employees, it monitored the phone lines of the journalists who might be receiving that information.
According to the news agency, 20 different phone lines were tapped, including not just work phones and the AP's main switchboard, but also the journalists' home and cell phones. In all, according to the AP, when you count all the people who came in contact with the phones in question, more than 100 journalists could have been affected.
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data

The National Security Agency has obtained direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other US internet giants, according to a top secret document obtained by the Guardian.
The NSA access is part of a previously undisclosed program called PRISM, which allows officials to collect material including search history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats, the document says

A chart prepared by the NSA, contained within the top-secret document obtained by the Guardian, underscores the breadth of the data it is able to obtain: email, video and voice chat, videos, photos, voice-over-IP (Skype, for example) chats, file transfers, social networking details, and more
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

medusala said:
Didn't they tap Associated Press's phones?

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/15/opinion/navarrette-obama-administration-secrecy

The Justice Department was interested in the conversations of anyone who worked on a May 7, 2012, story about the CIA thwarting a terrorist plot in Yemen. The administration wanted to know who was leaking information to the AP, so rather than monitor the phone lines of its own employees, it monitored the phone lines of the journalists who might be receiving that information.
According to the news agency, 20 different phone lines were tapped, including not just work phones and the AP's main switchboard, but also the journalists' home and cell phones. In all, according to the AP, when you count all the people who came in contact with the phones in question, more than 100 journalists could have been affected.
Click to expand...

Oh, that is. But this Verizon case is basically just accessing everyone's phone bills
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top