Remove this Banner Ad

Tuck in!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff99_Au
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

jeff99_Au

Team Captain
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Posts
378
Reaction score
21
Location
adelaide
AFL Club
Richmond
Simple we need a bigger body in the midfield
tuck was nearly our best last year

i understand hardwick is giving the kids a crack
but he is also wasting tuck.
Tuck still has 3 yrs or more in him (we should playing finals by then)
so PICK HIM

tuck is in our best 2-3 midfielders
great in an under player

TUCK MUST BE PICKED AGAINST THE ROOS!!!

stop wasting him in the 2nds
 
NO. Our midfield is better off without him, just like our defence is better off without Moore.
No, sorry MT, Moore will certainly slot straight back into the defence, I think Grimes must have been allergic to his opponent last night.
 
MT you have no idea what your talking about... How can you say our midfield is better with out him?
Last year we were one of the better clearance sides in the competition, tuck was a clearance monster and this year we have struggled big time with the clearances.
Anyone who has this theory that he is fighting for a spot with Cotchin, Martin, Foley is a moron, look how many midfielders Geelong and Collingwood have and are people forgetting that Tuck played across half back multiple times last year and did a very good job.

I will even go as far as saying that we would have beaten St.Kilda had Tuck played and probably beat Carlton.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

our midfield is better with tuck, however long term it is better without.

id bring him in for edwards personally, id say if we get rolled by north he will come into the side the week after.
 
Gee there is a lot of love for tuck this year. It almost rivals that for Gourdis last year. If tuck is such a great player then why couldn't we attract any interest in the trade period last year?

I read on another thread a few days/weeks back that Hardwick apparently said he is waiting a few rounds for the sting to go out of the game before he comes in. Hardly a glowig endoresment for tuck is it. Do we need to bring in a slow in and under or a speedy kid that can run and carry/use the ball?

If tuck comes in who does he replace?
 
NO. Our midfield is better off without him, just like our defence is better off without Moore.

We've won plenty of clearances the last 3 weeks. Tuck will just slow us down
LOL. whatever you are on could you please share it around?

v collingwood lost clearances 37-48
v Hawthorne lost clearances 44-51
v saints lost clearances 40-47
 
Tuck shouldn't be coming into the side because he should already be in it... We are better side with Tuck in.
 
Gee there is a lot of love for tuck this year. It almost rivals that for Gourdis last year. If tuck is such a great player then why couldn't we attract any interest in the trade period last year?

I read on another thread a few days/weeks back that Hardwick apparently said he is waiting a few rounds for the sting to go out of the game before he comes in. Hardly a glowig endoresment for tuck is it. Do we need to bring in a slow in and under or a speedy kid that can run and carry/use the ball?

If tuck comes in who does he replace?
Why is Tuck fault Hardwick is poor quality struggling coach
 
LOL. whatever you are on could you please share it around?

v collingwood lost clearances 37-48
v Hawthorne lost clearances 44-51
v saints lost clearances 40-47

Gee they are just smashings aren't they :rolleyes:
Young midfield who will only get better. No room for Tuck unless Grigg or Jacko get injured
 

Remove this Banner Ad

only you could regard the opposition getting an average of 20% more clearances as winning plenty of clearances.
 
how is winning more clearances going backwards?

Have a look at how many clearances foley and edwards have got this year.

Hardwick himself said you need to win the clearances to win the game, yet you believe by putting in a player who wins lots of clearances is going backwards.

Last year we matched or beat most side in clearances, even when loosing, this year we have been comprehesively beaten for clearances in every game - that is going backwards!

I'm normally what the craw would call a glass half full type, but having the opposition win on average 20% more clearances will never be winning plenty of clearances.
 
how is winning more clearances going backwards?

Have a look at how many clearances foley and edwards have got this year.

Hardwick himself said you need to win the clearances to win the game, yet you believe by putting in a player who wins lots of clearances is going backwards.

Last year we matched or beat most side in clearances, even when loosing, this year we have been comprehesively beaten for clearances in every game - that is going backwards!

I'm normally what the craw would call a glass half full type, but having the opposition win on average 20% more clearances will never be winning plenty of clearances.

Happy to see Tucky come in when he is in form and any other midfielder is out of form (Foley ought come back thru the 2s after out for so long) Really hoping to see him become a useful forward / mid. will harden us up no end.

without having seen a burgers game tho- i got nothing but memories - and his clearance work often couldve been better, but the fact is, he is a clearance machine
 
Gee they are just smashings aren't they :rolleyes:
Young midfield who will only get better. No room for Tuck unless Grigg or Jacko get injured

Care to explain your theory?

1. Collingwood and Geelong both have way more midfielders then us and they are top 4 sides.
2. The speed of the game is slowing down but yet you say Tuck will slow us down... Have you paid attention to any football over the last month, the clearances are playing a huge part on the out come of matches. Did you see essendons midfield smash st.kildas a couple of weeks ago, Hird plays big bodies in the midfield at the majority of centre clearances and Essendon seem to be travelling along very smoothly.
3. Tuck can play forward and back not just on the ball.
4. How old are you because some of the things you say make you sound 13?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom