USA President elections 2020

Remove this Banner Ad

magpie_marty said:
Trump and female reporters,
Click to expand...


The 1st one is hilariously stupid.

Trump has always blamed China for the virus, but when he says that to an asian reporter its now a racist attack on her? Very dumb. Very manipulative.

Also Trump attacks and demeans male reporters too, remember that guy whom had his white house access removed because Trump hated him?
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

ottoman said:
Lightwood is truly a nasty piece of work.
I can't believe people like her get elected.

If Biden does win I think the scenario you mentioned will happen.
So it's really Harris V Trump.
I don't know enough about Harris to make an opinion on her.
Click to expand...
Hardline, far left socialist.
 
Magpie Girl said:
Maggie there is no need to be so combative, people have a right to disagree with you

John Anderson shared the article. Obviously he has some respect for what is being said.
The fact that you so easily dismiss the contents of the article highlights the point the author is making.

i don’t care if you believe it or not, your sources are not the be all and end all, in fact many people discredit them.
If they’re your go-to bible fair enough, they’re not mine

And the article is about the media’s treatment of Trump, it’s not pertaining to be an expert on anything.
Click to expand...
It would be very difficult to have the media against you constantly. It’s true the media in America is dominated, owned and controlled by Liberals. Pres Trump could discover the cure for cancer and the media would find a way to spin it so it was bad.
 
ottoman said:
Trump will win.
Not because the majority like him, it will be a protest vote against the Dems.

People have had a gut full of BLM and Antifa. They have had a gut full of their cities burning down and they have had a gut full of the hypocricy of people like Lori Lightfoot and Nancy Palosi.
Also it doesn't help that the Dems have gone with a candidate that age has clearly caught up on.

If I was an American I would vote for Trump. I hate him but for me the election would be a case of the lesser of two evils.
Click to expand...
I know quite a lot of Americans who say that Trump’s base is stronger than ever and he‘ll easily win again. The Left have lost a lot of support over BLM and the riots. It’s showing in the polls which are always biased towards the left with the media. That’s why the Dems have started to publicly condemn the riots but it’s too late. The damage is done and their tactic backfired. They had hoped the carnage would force a change of government but it’s worked against them.
 
Last edited:
First, is there more than one?, debate is tomorrow.
Why though is there a a Fox commentator as moderator?
Any rational person understands this debate is already skewed towards the incumbent.
www.abc.net.au

The moderator of today's presidential debate has clashed with Trump in the past

US President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden will face off on the debate stage for the first time today. Here's what you need to know about the hotly anticipated event.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
 
Black_White said:
First, is there more than one?, debate is tomorrow.
Why though is there a a Fox commentator as moderator?
Any rational person understands this debate is already skewed towards the incumbent.
www.abc.net.au

The moderator of today's presidential debate has clashed with Trump in the past

US President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden will face off on the debate stage for the first time today. Here's what you need to know about the hotly anticipated event.
www.abc.net.au www.abc.net.au
Click to expand...
Get a grip. There isn't a conspiracy favouring Trump.

There's a three Presidential debates, and one Vice Presidential debate. The second debate is being moderated by C-Span's Steve Scully and the third is being moderated by Kristen Welker from NBC.

Wallace was a moderator of one of the debates in the last election. No one had an issue about it back then.
 
PonsfordMagpie said:
Get a grip. There isn't a conspiracy favouring Trump.

There's a three Presidential debates, and one Vice Presidential debate. The second debate is being moderated by C-Span's Steve Scully and the third is being moderated by Kristen Welker from NBC.

Wallace was a moderator of one of the debates in the last election. No one had an issue about it back then.
Click to expand...
Hmm...
He did face criticism prior to the 2016 debate for saying he didn't believe it was his job to be a "truth squad" when asked how he would deal with potential lies from the candidate
Click to expand...
Of course Wallace doesn’t receive criticism from your mob, but to not question/hold to account canndidate lies is simply pandering to Trump.
Because history tells us that where the lies will come from.
 
Black_White said:
Hmm...

Of course Wallace doesn’t receive criticism from your mob, but to not question/hold to account canndidate lies is simply pandering to Trump.
Because history tells us that where the lies will come from.
Click to expand...
Yet you excluded the part when he was praised for his moderating in 2016.

www.poynter.org

Fox News' Chris Wallace earns praise for debate performance - Poynter

From person-to-person coaching and intensive hands-on seminars to interactive online courses and media reporting, Poynter helps journalists sharpen skills and elevate storytelling throughout their careers.
www.poynter.org www.poynter.org
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PonsfordMagpie said:
Yet you excluded the part when he was praised for his moderating in 2016.

www.poynter.org

Fox News' Chris Wallace earns praise for debate performance - Poynter

From person-to-person coaching and intensive hands-on seminars to interactive online courses and media reporting, Poynter helps journalists sharpen skills and elevate storytelling throughout their careers.
www.poynter.org www.poynter.org
Click to expand...
Are you really happy for a moderator not wanting to question a candidate when he clearly lies?
2016 was much easier as Trump hadn’t yet fully realised the extent of lying he can do without questioning.
2020, with the internet as his plaything, Trump is fully aware he can lie without repercussions from the moderator.
They same man who, from his own mouth, isn’t interested in forcing a candidate to prove his lie as truth.
This debate will generate a lot of column inches, but anyone employed by Fox has to satisfy his master. And we know where his allegiances lie.
 
Cyclops said:
Very sad for our US friends that the two options are creepy old men who are unlikely to change much about their country either way.

I think their treat their politicians like rock stars (love or hate) and the two parties have the system sewn up so they don't have to do too much to get elected, people get sick of one side and swing naturally top the other.

I guess it works for them, or at least the rich ones because the US is a great success but its o great for the poor people.

I don't like any of our politicians but I trust Andrews and Morrison more than any one of those Yanks.


Ask Edmund Fitzgerald.
Click to expand...
You trust Andrew's? He has lied every day at the press conferences. This is a demonstrable fact proven with video and transcripts from the past few months. He is one sick, corrupt individual who has happily thrown his Health minister under the bus. He would do the same to his mum if it brought him political advantage.
He is entirely responsible for the second wave and subsequent shutdown which has led to the loss of countless jobs and hundreds of lives. Yet you trust him.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #41
Black_White said:
Are you really happy for a moderator not wanting to question a candidate when he clearly lies?
2016 was much easier as Trump hadn’t yet fully realised the extent of lying he can do without questioning.
2020, with the internet as his plaything, Trump is fully aware he can lie without repercussions from the moderator.
They same man who, from his own mouth, isn’t interested in forcing a candidate to prove his lie as truth.
This debate will generate a lot of column inches, but anyone employed by Fox has to satisfy his master. And we know where his allegiances lie.
Click to expand...
Actually I think Wallace is a very good choice and well respected in the industry (the only one from Fox and has a journalistic background). I have seen many of his interviews and he is unbiased.

Not sure he should be there as a fact checker as it would take up most of the one and a half hour.
 
Maggie5 said:
Actually I think Wallace is a very good choice and well respected in the industry (the only one from Fox and has a journalistic background). I have seen many of his interviews and he is unbiased.

Not sure he should be there as a fact checker as it would take up most of the one and a half hour.
Click to expand...
Well, he’s not doing a very good job.
He simply can’t stop Trump talking over Biden.
He simply can’t get Trump to answer a direct question.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #47
Leviathan Pie said:
Wasn't that a debacle.

Old man with Dementia vs someone who can't stand to be silent.
Click to expand...
I didn't see any signs of dementia.

However did see a narcissistic sociopath and did hear lots of lies.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #50
Leviathan Pie said:
You've got selective hearing if you're purely going at Trump on what we just witnessed.

Kamala Harris in your DP, come on Maggs - my goodness.
Click to expand...
Harris, eventually be first female President! Yessssss!!!

Goodness what did you miss? That debate was the biggest sh$tshow ever, he totally lost it because of his ego.

Would have been funny if not so serious, my friends in the US are crying through despair.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top