What is your most hated ground that has been used for AFL? the

Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Posts
9,294
Likes
8,958
Location
Just refuelling ⛽
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
BOLTS, REN, OKC, WFC, LVB, STORM
Moderator #26
I am rather bland with my AFL grounds. Have only been to the MCG and Docklands and I prefer the MCG. That being said, I have no real issues with Docklands. Easy to get to, amenities all around, has a roof (which is good for cricket) so can not complain at all, but it doesn’t have the same atmosphere. I really like going to Princes Park and Windy Hill (for AFLW and EDFL respectively) and I don’t mind Victoria Park, it would probably be my #1 if they didn’t knock down the big stand. Princes Park is probably a victim of being to big for its own good. There’s just too much mess around and nowhere to put it now without the Harris and Heatley stands, and no real reason to clean it. What, 4 reasonably attended AFLW games and around 15 low attendance VFL and TAC Cup games? Doesn’t help that the staff can be rude as **** sometimes as well. I intend on going to GMHBA for the cricket and maybe Ballarat too (but Port aren’t playing there any more which is a shame and they used to play on Sunday which isn’t helpful as I play my matches on Sunday.)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

RedV3x

Club Legend
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Posts
1,354
Likes
271
AFL Club
Fremantle
#27
I like the Dockland because of it's pricing and viewing but I agree it is a little soul less with a small crowd.
Subiaco was a terrible ground because the government cheaped out and disregarded the original expansion design which would have made the wings the best for viewing instead of the current worst.
Actually the worst AFL ground in W.A. is the WACA. Terrible misaligned miss-mash of stands with the lowest concourse angle of inclination.
The worst ground for overall cost must surely be ANZ stadium. This stadium was designed for the Olympics with no thought to it's use afterwards. It's a one bank stand that that ascends steeply into the clouds. At best, only 50% of seating would be considered reasonable. The concourses are open to the elements so there's shelter on a windy or rainy day. The main problem is that they designed the entire middle section to be moveable when common sense dictated that only the first 2.5 metres had to be moveable. The moveable section interferes with line of sight when in oval mode. ANZ is so bad that the Giants chose to play next door.
 

FreoRicci

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Posts
10,177
Likes
8,681
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Liverpool FC, Washington Wizards
#28
Subiaco oval, without a doubt. Having to suffer every second week going to that hole of a stadium. How it was done and allowed to be a stadium after 2000 is a mystery.
Remember taking a trip in 09 to see Freo play at the MCG then coming back the next week to a stadium that is somehow more expensive then the G, absolute disgusted. The comparison would always linger. The last game Freo played there, regardless of the thrashing, was joyous.
Dump of a ground.
 

BIRDBRAIN

Club Legend
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Posts
1,495
Likes
2,360
AFL Club
West Coast
#30
Went to Western Oval once, disgusting. But at least it had a local character, Docklands is basically the AFL's homeless shelter for the irrelevant minnow clubs of the league.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Posts
10,506
Likes
8,297
AFL Club
GWS
#31
I like the Dockland because of it's pricing and viewing but I agree it is a little soul less with a small crowd.
Subiaco was a terrible ground because the government cheaped out and disregarded the original expansion design which would have made the wings the best for viewing instead of the current worst.
Actually the worst AFL ground in W.A. is the WACA. Terrible misaligned miss-mash of stands with the lowest concourse angle of inclination.
The worst ground for overall cost must surely be ANZ stadium. This stadium was designed for the Olympics with no thought to it's use afterwards. It's a one bank stand that that ascends steeply into the clouds. At best, only 50% of seating would be considered reasonable. The concourses are open to the elements so there's shelter on a windy or rainy day. The main problem is that they designed the entire middle section to be moveable when common sense dictated that only the first 2.5 metres had to be moveable. The moveable section interferes with line of sight when in oval mode. ANZ is so bad that the Giants chose to play next door.
I know it's an old post but I have to question if you've ever been to ANZ. If you have you must have sat on the lower levels only. In which case it's wierd that you missed the obvious flaw there, the lack if gradient so cant see past the people in front of you.

To say there was no thought to it's use post Olympics is simply errant nonsense. A major refurb and reconfiguration was undertaken after the Olympics. You might have a view it wasn't done well but that's another matter.

On the upler levels the concourse is completely inside and you go outside to your seat, absolute weather protection.

An 80k stadium with the flaws it has was never going to be suitable for us as a home ground. The clubs position is it prefers it be retained, although unwilling to commit to games there. Simply because it'll be a lonnnng time before there's another 80k oval stadium in Sydney and it could have it's uses.
 

flamethrower

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
6,449
Likes
2,532
Location
Parkville Medical Precinct
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Other Teams
LA Angels, Sharks
#35
Arctic Park. Very cold. Too far away from the action. Took hours to get out of the joint if you drove (Who wants to catch a bus?). Good riddance!
It paid to be an AFL Member back in the day - could get out of the car park and onto the freeway in 10 minutes if you got a park on the members' stand side.

Worst is York Park before it was redeveloped. Uncomfortable and hardly any protection from the elements.
 

TY24

Procrastinator Extraordinaire
Joined
Mar 21, 2017
Posts
1,805
Likes
2,678
Location
6056 gang gang
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Arsenal, Scorchers, Glory, Wildcats
#36
Subiaco and ANZ by a long way, been to Subacio, Optus, MCG, Docklands, ANZ and Showgrounds and Subiaco was the worst from a spectator's point of view, ANZ from a players point of view. Anyone over 6ft would know how horrid the bench seating at Subiaco was, got to the point where I actively avoided going to West Coast games out of sheer discomfort. Optus has been a welcome change.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PerthBoy86

Premiership Player
Joined
May 23, 2016
Posts
3,844
Likes
2,701
AFL Club
West Coast
#37
As a spectator i don't get the hate for Docklands. It's convenient, comfortable no matter what the weather is like, and viewing is good, what more could you ask for? Aside from the playing surface I'd say it's pretty good. I haven't been to many major venues, just Subi when I was back in Perth, which wasn't the best, ANZ in Sydney once, and of course the MCG and Docklands/Marvel. Oh and the Whitten Oval, which is like a km from where I live. Keen to check out a few more grounds, starting with Optus when I visit home next.
 

raymond35

All Australian
Joined
Jan 5, 2004
Posts
789
Likes
1,075
Location
gold coast
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
collingwood vfl
#38
As a spectator i don't get the hate for Docklands. It's convenient, comfortable no matter what the weather is like, and viewing is good, what more could you ask for? Aside from the playing surface I'd say it's pretty good. I haven't been to many major venues, just Subi when I was back in Perth, which wasn't the best, ANZ in Sydney once, and of course the MCG and Docklands/Marvel. Oh and the Whitten Oval, which is like a km from where I live. Keen to check out a few more grounds, starting with Optus when I visit home next.
- the good seats are unavailable to the average punter and sit empty
- standing room is virtually nonexistent
- decent ground level seats cost a fortune
- most supporters are herded up to the nose bleed seats, which seem incredibly high up
- the food is inedible
- place has no atmosphere at all
- the place somehow holds 30,000 less people than the stadium it replaced
 

its been done

Team Captain
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Posts
357
Likes
258
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Port Melbourne, Norwood, St George
#39
- the good seats are unavailable to the average punter and sit empty
- standing room is virtually nonexistent
- decent ground level seats cost a fortune
- most supporters are herded up to the nose bleed seats, which seem incredibly high up
- the food is inedible
- place has no atmosphere at all
- the place somehow holds 30,000 less people than the stadium it replaced
Not to mention the facilities can't cope with a 25,000 plus crowd
 

fumbler

Cyber enhanced for lulz
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Posts
28,246
Likes
25,683
Location
Cairns
AFL Club
Richmond
#41
Don’t forget the three entrances and four exits that funnel you into an area that’s tiny and you then all head over to southern cross station like sheep.

Sell it.
 

Espe

Club Legend
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Posts
1,308
Likes
1,547
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Liverpool
#44
I don't get the hate that the Docklands stadium gets. Yeah they stuffed it up building it the wrong way so day games with the roof open is just unwatchable. But for the standard night game its great! Easy to get to, great seats pretty much no matter where you sit, atmosphere is great with the roof closed. I'd much rather watch a game at the docklands then the MCG where i feel too far away.
 
Top Bottom