Why?

[Moo://_Cow]

Did we give up Clint Bizzel and Ronnie Burns???? look at the form Bizzel's in now

 

[ScouseCat]

Originally posted by Moo://_Cow
Did we give up Clint Bizzel and Ronnie Burns???? look at the form Bizzel's in now

Ronnie Burns is a good player in a good side, therefore I'm not surprised he's doing well at the Crows this year. Unfortunately, Mark Thompson wasn't able to get the best out of Ronnie Burns unlike Gary Ayres, who can for some reason and could at Geelong as well.

As for Clint Bizzel, he was paid a large salary at Geelong and wasn't peforming to the level that deserved such high wages, therefore I'm not unhappy he was traded to Melbourne. Good luck to him.

 

[JUBJUB]

Re: Re: Why?

Originally posted by ScouseCat
Ronnie Burns is a good player in a good side, therefore I'm not surprised he's doing well at the Crows this year.

Is he doing well at the Crows ?
He's been dropped once or twice and in a few games,like todays,he's barely got a touch.


Bizzell is doing well at Melbourne,but who would he replace in defence at Geelong ?

Anyway we got James Kelly,so it was a good move.

 

[Fall Out Boy]

Re: Re: Re: Why?

Originally posted by JUBJUB
Anyway we got James Kelly,so it was a good move.

Spot on.

We've got a class midfielder for the next 10-12 years, whereas Clint will be retired within 5 years.

 

[Bakes]

He is looking good in a very VERY ordinary defense. With Ingerson retiring and Nicholson being injured didn't help the dees. The only other tall I can think of is Lamb .
Those Melbourne players are only solid at best, so its no wonder that a player with the potential (has he reached it this year????) as high as Bizzells is looking good with an average year.

And I agree with Scouse about Biz, and JubJub about pea heart.