Guys, Ranga might be a player but we don't know yet. Let's not get too caught up in the hype of a guy who's never played genuine senior footy. He isn't that tall or super-quick, while his skills have a lil way to go from reports.
If we rookie him, we can develop him for a year or so and then see if he's worth elevating. Pretty sure you'll find that's what we'll do. That way we keep others' mits off him but keep him at the Cattery.
We can then draft others - after all, this is the last good crack at a draft for a bit.
As for de-listing Hogan, that is an absurd suggestion. Word is he is a real keeper.
It's only his second year and he was an emergency earlier this year. Sheez, cut the kid some slack. He's trying to break into the best team in the country.
I'm sorry but putting him on the rookie list defies logic. Why the hell would he accept a rookie listing position if he is worth a 1st or 2nd round pick? He'd have to have the shittest negotiator in the world as his manager to accept that. It's basically forfeiting 50% of his salary plus potential match payments.
As for him being unproven at senior level that's pretty much the case for 70% of 1st round pick anyway.
Regarding Hogan. AFL rules require us to draft a minimum of three players. Most people are reluctantly saying he is the 3rd choice to delist. David Johnson, Tenace are first two and then we have a choice of players coming out of contract. They are Hogan, West and Djerkurra.



