Society/Culture Circumcision

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
an

a

tract

iv


llook

n

penis

thats a kfc utensil, finger lick'n
Gus Poyet said:
I'm not trolling in this case.

In the right light mine looks like Paul Walker.

paulwalker.jpg
Click to expand...
 
The only advantage of being uncircumsised is that you get to rub your tockley with soap more often.

You know, to get rid of the dick cheese and stuff.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

BUMP.

Just going to dump a bunch of copypasta on the subject.

______________________________________________
Today is the day we are all gonna know the truth. Cut or uncut? Of course the

majority of people already know the truth but for the offended minority who can't accept it,

here are some facts.

1: Cumdumpsters enjoy uncut utensils more than cut utensils.
Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html

2: Fapping feels better.
Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/

3: Circumcision sensitivity.
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285532,00.html

4: Despite the reduced sensitivity, cutfags last just as long as uncutfags when *******.
Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...ionid=E233A9E106A9A6D724B4E3606446784E.d03t01

5: Cutfags have a more difficult time fapping.
Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646.x/abstract

Which was the reason it was promoted in the USA.
Source: http://english.pravda.ru/science/health/27-03-2006/77873-circumcision-0/

6: Increases erectile dysfunctions.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14979200&dopt=Abstract|

7: If too much skin is removed in circumcision, it can make the utensil smaller since the dong needs some skin to expand during an erection:
Source: http://www.altermd.com/Penis and Scrotal Surgery/buried_penis.htm

http://www.drgreene.com/azguide/inconspicuous-penis

8: Circumcision does not lower chance on AIDS.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22096758/

9: Circumcision is more hygienic.
Partially true. But who the * doesn't clean their dick? It's a three second job you do when you shower so this is not a valid argument. Stop being a lazy fellow.

10: Uncut looks like an anteater.
In flaccid state, sometimes true. But who the * cares about flaccid dicks? No one. Flaccid dicks are for peeing.

Circumcision decreases penile sensitivity
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23374102?dopt=Abstract

Circumcision associated with sexual difficulties
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672947

Circumcision linked to alexithymia
http://www.mensstudies.com/content/2772r13175400432/?p=a7068101fbdd48819f10dd04dc1e19fb&pi=4

The exaggeration of the benefits of circumcision in regards to HIV/AIDS transmission
http://jme.bmj.com/content/36/12/798.abstract

Circumcision/HIV claims are based on insufficient evidence
http://www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf

There is no case for the widespread implementation of circumcision as a preventative measure to stop transmission of AIDS/HIV
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00761.x/full

Circumcision decreases sexual pleasure
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977

Circumcision decreases efficiency of nerve response in the glans of the penis
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847

Circumcision policy is influenced by psychosocial factors rather than alleged health benefits
http://www.circumcision.org/policy.htm

Circumcision linked to pain, trauma, and psychosexual sequelae
http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/boyle6/

Circumcision results in significant loss of erogenous tissue
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8800902

Circumcision has negligible benefit
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9091693

Neonatal circumcision linked to pain and trauma
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9057731

Circumcision may lead to need for increased care and medical attention in the first 3 years of life
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9393302

Circumcision linked to psychological trauma
http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/goldman1/

Circumcision may lead to abnormal brain development and subsequent deviations in behavior
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10657682

wedish Pediatric Society (they outright call for a ban)
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...-urge-ban-on-circumcision/UPI-61961329678560/

Royal Dutch Medical Association calls it a violation of human rights, and calls for a “strong policy of deterrence.”
http://knmg.artsennet.nl/web/file?u...e-f42b-47a5-960e-be08025b7b04&contentid=77976

this policy has been endorsed by several other organizations:

The Netherlands Society of General Practitioners,

The Netherlands Society of Youth Healthcare Physicians,

The Netherlands Association of Paediatric Surgeons,

The Netherlands Association of Plastic Surgeons,

The Netherlands Association for Paediatric Medicine,

The Netherlands Urology Association, and

The Netherlands Surgeons’ Association.

College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia
https://www.cpsbc.ca/files/u6/Circumcision-Infant-Male.pdf

"This procedure should be delayed to a later date when the child can make his own informed decision. Parental preference alone does not justify a non-therapeutic procedure…. Advise parents that the current medical consensus is that routine infant male circumcision is not a recommended procedure; it is non-therapeutic and has no medical prophylactic basis; current evidence indicates that previously-thought prophylactic public health benefits do not out-weigh the potential risks.…. Routine infant male circumcision does cause pain and permanent loss of healthy tissue."

Australian Federation of Aids organizations They state that circumcision has “no role” in the HIV epidemic.
http://www.afao.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/4528/BP0709_Circumcision.pdf

TheGerman Association of Pediatricians called for a ban recently.
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/...inet-approves-controversial-circumcision-bill

The German Association of Child and Youth Doctors recently Attacked the AAP’s claims,
http://www.kinderaerzte-im-netz.de/bvkj/kinpopup/psfile/pdf/70/121126_Ste50aa5e211e6a6.pdf

saying the benefits they claim, including HIV reduction, are “questionable,” and that “Seen from the outside, cultural bias reflecting the normality of non-therapeutic male circumcision in the US seems obvious, and the report’s conclusions are different from those reached by doctors in other parts of the Western world, including Europe, Canada, and Australia.”

British Association of Paediatric Urologists "they are promoting “Irreversible mutilating surgery.”
http://www.nature.com/news/doctors-back-circumcision-1.11296

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan has taken a position against it
http://www.cmaj.ca/content/167/5/532.2.full


The Central Union for Child Welfare “considers that circumcision of boys that violates the personal integrity of the boys is not acceptable unless it is done for medical reasons to treat an illness. The basis for the measures of a society must be an unconditional respect for the bodily integrity of an under-aged person… Circumcision can only be allowed to independent major persons, both women and men, after it has been ascertained that the person in question wants it of his or her own free will and he or she has not been subjected to pressure.”

http://www.childcentre.info/10595/

Royal College of Surgeons of England
http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/publications/docs/male_circumcision.html

“The one absolute indication for circumcision is scarring of the opening of the foreskin making it non- retractable (pathological phimosis). This is unusual before five years of age.”…”The parents and, when competent, the child, must be made fully aware of the implications of this operation as it is a non-reversible procedure.”

British Medical Association
http://bma.org.uk/-/media/Files/PDFs/Practical advice at work/Ethics/Circumcision.pdf

"it is now widely accepted, including by the BMA, that this surgical procedure has medical and psychological risks."

Australian Medical Association Has a policy of discouraging it
http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/ama2/

Australian College of Paediatrics:

“The possibility that routine circumcision may contravene human rights has been raised because circumcision is performed on a minor and is without proven medical benefit. Whether these legal concerns are valid will probably only be known if the matter is determined in a court of law …..Neonatal male circumcision has no medical indication. It is a traumatic procedure performed without anaesthesia to remove a normal and healthy prepuce.”

http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/acp1996/

Royal Australasian College of Physicians
http://www.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=65118B16-F145-8B74-236C86100E4E3E8E

"Some men strongly resent having been circumcised as infants. There has been increasing interest in this problem, evidenced by the number of surgical and non-surgical techniques for recreation of the foreskin."

ON that note, 74% of Australian doctors overall believe circumcision should not be offered, and 51% consider it abuse. Circumcision used to be common in Australia, but the movement against it spread faster there than America, where rates continue to drop.

http://www.australiandoctor.com.au/news/latest-news/strong-opposition-to-newborn-circumcision

Royal Australasian College of Surgeons I like this one especially. It’s a detailed evaluation of the arguments in favor of circumcision, They note that during one of the recent trials in Africa, the researchers claimed there was no loss of sexual satisfaction, when in fact there was. But the RACS called them out:

“Despite uncircumcised men reporting greater sexual satisfaction, which was statistically significant,Kigozi et al (2008) concluded that adult male circumcision does not adversely affect sexual satisfaction or clinically significant function in men.” In general, they discuss how there’s no evidence to support it.

http://www.surgeons.org/media/292210/Male_non-therapeutic_circumcision.pdf

The Norwegian Council of Medical Ethics states that ritual circumcision of boys is not consistent with important principles of medical ethics, that it is without medical value, and should not be paid for with public funds.
http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/gulbrandsen1/

The Norwegian Children’s Ombudsman is opposed as well.
http://www.crin.org/resources/infodetail.asp?id=25991

The Denmark National Council for Children is also opposed.
http://www.crin.org/violence/search/closeup.asp?infoID=19016

And recently, the politically appointed Health minister of Norway opposed a ban on circumcision, yet the ban was supported by the Norwegian Medical Association, the Norwegian Nurses Organization, the Norwegian Ombudsman for Children, and the University of Oslo.
http://www.thelocal.no/page/view/minister-says-no-to-circumcision-ban-

Swedish Association for Sexuality Education published this guide that talks about circumcision, in a pretty negative way. not an official advocacy policy but it makes it fairly clear. it also mentions the frenulum is sexually sensitive, and helps prevent infection by blocking fluid from the urethra; the frenulum is often removed in an infant circumcision, yet easier to leave intact if an adult is circumcised.
http://www.rfsu.se/en/Engelska/About-rfsu/Resources/Publications/Dicktionary/

And this study shows significant harms to men’s sexual ability and satisfaction after circumcision.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17155977

*****WARNING- GRAPHIC CONTENT... DON"T WATCH IF SQUEAMISH*******








"Canadian man who was born as a healthy male, but was sexually reassigned and raised as female after his penis was accidentally destroyed during circumcision.... He later committed suicide, owing to suffering years of severe depression, financial instability, and a troubled marriage."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Reimer
 
stralia seems to be another fanatic trying to justify his ugly todger.
 
stralia said:
We can't all have Mantis approved genitalia.
Click to expand...

True enough.

Have no fear, I hear the hairy lipped ladies of the world really find them attractive.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Jetwa5h said:
How the f@#k does he wipe his bum or relieve himself, hope he is circumcised might be hard to pull the skin back and clean if you can't find it
Click to expand...
At least he doesn't have to/can't look at his penis. I'd hazard a guess that it's also a while since anyone else has seen it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top