telsor
Hall of Famer
So you are just going to ignore the responses to your psycho babble?
Not like he can come up with a reasoned argument for them.
Take more drugs until starts to mark sense!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you are just going to ignore the responses to your psycho babble?
I'm doing no such thing.
So you are just going to ignore the responses to your psycho babble?
You can't just send them to northern south Australia with the shirts on their back and pretend its 5000 years ago. How do you expect them to generate income otherwise
One of the most honest white versions of Australia day and social movements.
Every single statutory law in this country is immoral and unjust to a black felluh, every single one. Our whole justice system, our whole political system is built on lies to hide genocide. Common law is different, hence why they show respect to people running the illegal unjust systems.
So many bigots in here. So many bigots who are adults and access to the net, should know better.
One day we'll talk about the villages the red coats burnt down, then lied they ever existed
One of the most honest white versions of Australia day and social movements.
Every single statutory law in this country is immoral and unjust to a black felluh, every single one. Our whole justice system, our whole political system is built on lies to hide genocide. Common law is different, hence why they show respect to people running the illegal unjust systems.
So many bigots in here. So many bigots who are adults and access to the net, should know better.
One day we'll talk about the villages the red coats burnt down, then lied they ever existed
Why does being first to a spot of land mean automatic ownership? Natural law says ownership goes to those most powerful enough to take and control it. It was essentially a war between first Australians and second Australians and second won. What's so immoral about that?
theoretically whats to stop the Australian government claiming ownership by conquest tomorrow? I know it'd never happen but would it be legal if it did?
If one was to come your house. Take your things.Kill you family. Would tthat be OK? Is that not identical on a smaller scale? What is so immoral? Natural law
Not trying to be smart. I can't see the difference
If one was to come your house. Take your things.Kill you family. Would tthat be OK? Is that not identical on a smaller scale? What is so immoral? Natural law
Not trying to be smart. I can't see the difference
If one was to come your house. Take your things.Kill you family. Would tthat be OK? Is that not identical on a smaller scale? What is so immoral? Natural law
Not trying to be smart. I can't see the difference
theoretically whats to stop the Australian government claiming ownership by conquest tomorrow? I know it'd never happen but would it be legal if it did?
Based on little graham 's humanity originated in Australia theory weren't the British just the prodigal sons coming home?
My personal reaction would be to fight, as some indigenous clans did. But that doesn't mean ownership under the laws of nature wouldn't transfer to the murderers if they took possession. It's a hard one to remove yourself personally from but my underlying purpose here is to challenge the "we were here first" way of thinking by saying it doesn't mean first inhabitants get to have the land for eternity.