Seriously Slobbo should be arrested for that article... If not can see Mike Sheehan murdering him for singlehandedly making a joke out of being the senior football writer.... Mike Sheehan then to be given a medal of honour.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It sounds like you want to live in a dictatorship where one person's view of "sensibility" determines the law. Good luck with that. Hopefully the person is not an ego manic like James Hird or you could find yourself left by the wayside. (I hope I'm not getting dumber by conversing with you)They maybe. But justices construing that said power comes from the players not objecting is plain dumb. (Not suggesting that all Adelaide supporters are dumb by any means.)
Wookie you have a weak way of living. Personality strength does not separate right from wrong. The question is how does the players lack of objections to the process make the process legal. (Right is separated from wrong by human sensibility, not your accredited monkeys on their way to the top of ladder. Who may have some human sensibilities but aren't beyond the reproach that you are suggesting.)
On your 2nd paragraph.....not only Billionaire Paul, but represented by Ashurst lawyers.......the little man lol
On your 3rd paragraph.....
What is staggering to me, and quite obviously a lie, is that Robbo claims to have attended at least one class in year 11!!!Well it just got lower again.....and he is the Chief Football Writer for News Ltd...
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/ja...es-mark-robinson/story-fndv7pj3-1227202676160
"IT’S the vibe. It’s Mabo. It’s Hird.
For most of us, our relationship with the High Court of Australia comes from watching The Castle.
It’s in Canberra. It’s wigs and silks. And judges — and there could be up to seven of them sitting in judgment — are a bunch of crusty old people who look after the little people."
No, self awareness is what he has in spades. It's real world awareness that he is totally devoid of. In that respect ha is a vacuum in every sense of the word.Again courtesy of Robbo:
"But Hird hasn’t been good at waiting throughout of all this.
It’s why, if he does succeed in getting to the High Court, it should not be a surprise.
To him, it’s not about money, even though by the end he could be as much as $500,000 out of pocket, nor is it about what people think of him, or whether other AFL coaches talk to him, or whether the AFL welcomes him back with open arms.
No, it’s about standing up to organisations such as the AFL and ASADA when he believes their conduct was wrong."
----------------------------------------------------
Get this lol, .....how's the last line.
Does Albert have ZERO self awareness lol
You can't expect too much from them. Any self respecting lawyer would have told him he had no case. He can't have had the top minds telling him to proceed, only the hard of cash flow...I would seem Hirds legal team was confused over the difference between a retrial and an appeal.
Wonder about the choice of Amendola, whose claim to fame is losing in court to the unions on the Patricks and O'Connors Meats cases. He most likely brought Hanke to the table (having worked with him on Patrick's)
What is staggering to me, and quite obviously a lie, is that Robbo claims to have attended at least one class in year 11!!!
This deserves a special mention for being bloody hilarious!!!!What an article! Next we'll have Martin Hardie stepping into the Dennis Denuto role.
Maybe he's getting his balloons reinflated? I heard his party was a letdown, so to speak....seeing a Doctor/Chemist in US?
Have you seen what a boat shed at Portsea is selling for this year -over $500K. With those prices you can't be too picky. Not to mention with the falling dollar, European Cars are set for significant price risesYou can't expect too much from them. Any self respecting lawyer would have told him he had no case. He can't have had the top minds telling him to proceed, only the hard of cash flow...
They are hardly unaware of the contract terms when entering, nor unadvised. I'm afraid that's a failed argument.It baffles me that they didn't use this point in the first place. And because they didn't, any appeal to the High Court about the AFL contract wouldn't even make it to a hearing because it's not a valid point for appeal.
It'd be a good idea for any club that has problems with the AFL in the future to take note of it, because I think the fairness of the AFL contract to the players could have a strong case.
Sucks to be Essendon/Hird for having bad lawyers.
I always picture Robbo thusly when writing about James AlbertThey block that word now? Ok then, robbo is a 'very, very special person'
Katie Smith....hot little number....only chick at Bendigo High to smoke Marlie Reds.....Robbo was there on a mission....his spitball hurl at the blackboard missed....Katie laughed....at him....not with him......so ended Robbo's dalliance with Legal Studies class.
Just finished the dishes.
I have a description for you: Robbo is the Steven Segal of 'journalism'.
Seriously Slobbo should be arrested for that article... If not can see Mike Sheehan murdering him for singlehandedly making a joke out of being the senior football writer.... Mike Sheehan then to be given a medal of honour.
Just because a contract exists doesn't mean it's fair and legal.They are hardly unaware of the contract terms when entering, nor unadvised. I'm afraid that's a failed argument.
You on the West Ends, grizz?We do. Our relationship soured somewhat when he finally remembered he exchanged his car for a six-pack of West end Export one desperate night.
You on the West Ends, grizz?
We do. Our relationship soured somewhat when he finally remembered he exchanged his car for a six-pack of West end Export one desperate night.