Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing but bile from you.
vomit vomit vomit vomit vomit vomit vomit vomit
"might not" - I thought the science was settled, I don't think that is a scientific term. I thought it was too late for 'might not'
So why was Lomborg shut down for cost-benefit analysis - His idea is adaption is the best method not mitigation which has not worked and will not work until we all go back to the dark ages.
The climate has always changed, what we are currently experiencing is nothing unusual, despite whatever dodgy climate models say...the exact models that I could do on my calculator.
So if adaption is the best way forward....I guess the government grants can go to to that and not to the scientists to come up with more models indicating our impending doom. Somehow I don't think these scientists will like that idea....Can't see these scientsits giving up billions in government grants to fund god awful wind towers..or solar batteries or other solar technology.....food for thought.
Of course, you find it beautiful, that's why you found two photos that cover up and hide the majority of how it really looks.
I'm just trying to help you come to terms with who you really are.I don't understand, are you, some campaigner on the internet, trying to tell me that I don't really like Battersea Power Station? That I'm just making this up, lying or something? Why is this so incomprehensible to you? It's not like Battersea doesn't have any fans. Plenty of people are fond of it.
I admit, you really have no idea.Well currently our predictions are all WRONG WRONG WRONG.
The best way to fund R&D is through allocation the government grants from all the climate scientists who are proven to be wrong wrong wrong .
So you admit, global warming is all about wealth redistribution. classic
Carbon tax did absolutely nothing apart from raising consumer prices.
The science is settled, climate change is real, there should not be no ',might' unless you admit you really have no idea.
I hope it continues as well. Life has flourished with CO2 levels 4 times higher than what we have today and it's not going to affect anything major except global temperature and sea level. Who wouldn't enjoy a tropical environment?Except that CO2 is now past 400ppm globally. Yeah except that.
The existing tropical environments?I hope it continues as well. Life has flourished with CO2 levels 4 times higher than what we have today and it's not going to affect anything major except global temperature and sea level. Who wouldn't enjoy a tropical environment?
I admit, you really have no idea.
I hope it continues as well. Life has flourished with CO2 levels 4 times higher than what we have today and it's not going to affect anything major except global temperature and sea level. Who wouldn't enjoy a tropical environment?
Are you trolling bra? After dealing with Kirks stupidity for a few pages my irony metre is out of wack.
What the carbon tax actually did
http://www.news.com.au/national/car...ry-audit-reveals/story-fnho52ip-1226687143830
What the carbon tax actually did
http://www.news.com.au/national/car...ry-audit-reveals/story-fnho52ip-1226687143830
Cost jobs
Raised prices
We have just come out of a CO2 starved time period. We are just going back to normal levels of 1000+ppm CO2. I have no idea why everyone is jumping up an down about it all. WE HAVE HAD ICE AGES WITH 8000PPM CO2!The existing tropical environments?
OK, you got me!We have just come out of a CO2 starved time period. We are just going back to normal levels of 1000+ppm CO2. I have no idea why everyone is jumping up an down about it all. WE HAVE HAD ICE AGES WITH 8000PPM CO2!
OK, you got me!
I thought you were being serious.
What the carbon tax actually did
http://www.news.com.au/national/car...ry-audit-reveals/story-fnho52ip-1226687143830
What the carbon tax actually did
http://www.news.com.au/national/car...ry-audit-reveals/story-fnho52ip-1226687143830
Cost jobs
Raised prices
While higher energy bills is the biggest expense, the carbon tax has also added to rising packaging, transport and other expenses.
When have I been wrong?
Do you get tired of being wrong all the time?
I really should give up after your previous response but seeing as you asked the same question twice you seem eager for a dialogue.
The carbon taxes impact was almost entirely felt in the coal and gas fired power generation sectors due to generous subsidies to trade exposed industries. The vast majority of the rise in electricity costs however were due to over investment in capacity and power lines.
Next.
Do you get tired of being wrong all the time?
When have I been wrong?
Have you been right in a single post?
Broken clocks and all that, surely you've been right at least once?
You do you realise that when SizeMatters mentioned this it was in the context of climate change being a planetary reality most likely happening currently?
Do you realise how different a "tropical" earth will look?
CLIMATE CHANGE IS ABOUT WEALTH DISTRIBUTION!
Don't worry replying I can do it myself.
Pathetic.
Alarmists are scared of the truth.