Mega Thread Hird Appeal dismissed by Full bench of the Federal Court 30/1- Hird will not appeal. Details in OP.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
lmost Doc Martin ‏@MartinHardieUni now11 seconds ago
Tell Richard that I'm not disappointed but that I have had my worst fears about 'democracy' and the rule of law confirmed
the_lonely_canoe_by_peterk-d72ozqu.jpg


Come back, Martin!
No, let him go. It's better this way...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Richard Ings ‏@ringsau 5m5 minutes ago
ASADA office is only a few km's away but I am sure I can hear that office cheering. They dodged a legal and political bullet.

Great day for the person at ASADA who got called in to explain the award of costs against them in the Alavi case; hope they stalled their meeting long enough to hear the Hird verdict come through.
 
The stupidity of the essendon board is endless. No matter how many times he costs them money they'll keep supporting him it seems.
 
What a great way to start the weekend! Hearing that Hird yet again got absolutely pantsed in court. I hope he takes it to the High Court just to see him get laughed out again. His lawyers are terrible.

Generally speaking, a party to an appeal is bound by the way that party conducted the case at trial; and a point cannot be raised for the first time on appeal when it could possibly have been met (as here) by calling evidence at trial.

This point should never have to be written in a court appeal judgment. It's Law 101. Hirds lawyers are as delusional as he is.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Chris Kaias ‏@ChrisKaias
  • Full Court agrees that ASADA+AFL were engaged in separate enquiries and co-operated, that was the extent of the 'joint investigation' [131]
  • Full Court finds that contrary to submission that ASADA and AFL could not work together, it was a 'mandated cooperative relationship' [140]
  • While the WADA Code does envisage close cooperation, the court didn't place much emphasis on this, would have decided same either way [149]
  • Court would not entertain arguments about the AFL contracts and self-incrimination because that argument was not run at trial [150]-[163]
 
Chris Kaias ‏@ChrisKaias 2m2 minutes ago
  • AFL could have i'viewed players alone then given to ASADA. Therefore ASADA did not facilitate abrogation of self-incrimination rights [193]
  • On self-incrimination point, again fatal that the compulsive powers were the AFL's and they were not in dispute. ASADA did not compel [189]
  • 'The appellant’s proposition that it was irrelevant that ASADA itself did not use any coercive power must fail.' [195]
 
Update from Chairman Paul Little
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/2015-01-30/update-from-chairman-paul-little


Paul Little January 30, 2015 4:35 PM



Dear members,

I wanted to provide a quick update on a number of matters relating to the ongoing ASADA investigation.

As you would be aware, James Hird was unsuccessful in his appeal today. James was exercising his legal right and was naturally very disappointed his appeal was not upheld.

We look forward to James continuing to focus on preparing our players for the upcoming season and building on the great work he has done over the last four months.

In relation to the AFL Anti Doping Tribunal, unfortunately the process is taking longer than we initially anticipated. As a club, we remain confident in the players' position and will continue to provide ongoing support to our players and their families.

While we all would like this matter to be resolved as quickly as possible, it is now expected a final decision will not be handed down until March.

In response to media speculation about our participation in the NAB Challenge series, it is important to clarify that any suggestion we will not be playing is premature.

As it stands, our players who have been issued with infraction notices can have their provisional suspensions lifted at the discretion of the AFL Commission. However, it is unclear if this would impact the ability of a player to use this time against a potential sanction in the event of a guilty finding.

We hope to have clarity on this complicated and unprecedented matter in the coming weeks and are working closely with all of the relevant parties to ensure we reach a satisfactory outcome for our players as quickly as possible.

Finally, on behalf of the Board and everyone at the Club, I’d like to thank the Essendon members and supporters for their continued support of our players through this difficult period.

The last two years have been testing times for us all but you have stood by your club through everything. To have already signed up more than 40,000 members is a fantastic achievement and we are on track to set a new record of 65,000 members in 2015.

I can assure you the coaches and players are working harder than ever to prepare for the upcoming home and away season. I encourage you all to come out and watch one of our February opening training sessions at the True Value Solar Centre.

Go Bombers!

Paul Little AO
 
Chris Kaias ‏@ChrisKaias 7m7 minutes ago
  • No basis for submission there was an absence of free consent or that the appellant did not waive any rights against self-incrimination [198]
  • Section 22 (the 'necessary and convenient' power) is to be read broadly and not subject to an implied prohibition against co-operation [210]
  • Court agrees with Middleton that cooperation with AFL was 'convenient' and therefore investigation supported by s22 of ASADA Act [211]-[213]
  • Fair to say there was complete and unanimous support of Middleton J's judgment by the Full Court.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top