Just not overly successful , a bit like us ...brand is bigger than their success
Please tell me you're joking??!!??
Collingwood no more successful than us??????
the heck you smoking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just not overly successful , a bit like us ...brand is bigger than their success
1 Flag since 1990Please tell me you're joking??!!??
Collingwood no more successful than us??????
the heck you smoking
How about 1 flag and 2 Grand Finals since 2000 compared to none?1 Flag since 1990
1 Flag since 1990
How about 1 flag and 2 Grand Finals since 2000 compared to none?
Oops that makes them even closer to our performances2002, 2003, 2010, 2011 grand finals
2002, 2003, 2010, 2011 grand finals
does this mean Sloane to the hawks and danger to north?That's Danger's new twitter profile pic by the way.
Not shooting the lights out compared to our 4 prelims.... Under achievers given their resources
Or both to a side with stripes..does this mean Sloane to the hawks and danger to north?
Adelaide's highly sought midfielder, Rory Sloane, is close to signing a long-term contract with the Crows, rebuffing Victorian clubs.
Sloane, who is among the game's most accomplished midfielders and one of the most desirable players on the market, is close to being secured on a long-term contract of four or even five years.
The Crows have been reluctant to hand players contracts of that length in the past, but the liberalised market heavily favours elite players of Sloane's age of just 25.
A number of Melbourne clubs were keen on Sloane, who is originally from Melbourne's outer eastern suburbs. St Kilda were open in their interest in the midfielder, who could have received a massive contract to return to Victoria but has indicated he is happy at Adelaide. Sloane last week talked down the prospect of leaving the Crows.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/adelaide-crows/sloane-close-to-deal-with-adelaide-20150528-ghc281.html
Then some more stuff about Danger after that.
For some reason the crows are fair game with s**t like this.Not sure if it's been brought up but is anyone else ******* fuming about the two questions regarding Dangerfield's future in the AFL fan survey? I mean what the **** does it have to do with what fans think about the game? What did the Crows do to the AFL to cop s**t like this? There wasn't any questions about what club Rance will be playing for in 2016 so why is there about Patty?
Seriously ******* low AFL.
Thread started on the main board. Let's see what the masses think.Not sure if it's been brought up but is anyone else ******* fuming about the two questions regarding Dangerfield's future in the AFL fan survey? I mean what the **** does it have to do with what fans think about the game? What did the Crows do to the AFL to cop s**t like this? There wasn't any questions about what club Rance will be playing for in 2016 so why is there about Patty?
Seriously ******* low AFL.
Where? I can't find it.Thread started on the main board. Let's see what the masses think.
Thread started on the main board. Let's see what the masses think.
Another bullseye for the Roach.http://m.dailytelegraph.com.au/spor...e-adelaide-crows/story-e6frexx0-1226370442671
Anyone remember this from almost exactly 3 years ago?
Can we just wait until he is signed before congratulating ourselves?
Watching him live, Jen, I would suggest that Danger most definitely can be bothered to perform. Against the Saints, we needed him to go back to his inside game a lot more and he did at certain stages. He has also been providing blocks and tackles to allow others better access to the ball.