Retired #12: Mark Baguley - Will retire at seasons end - 27/8

Remove this Banner Ad

BrunoV said:
I've been waivering on whether he is good enough.

Think I've got to move on from whatever I perceive his deficiencies to be. He's rock solid. If it wasn't for the AFL love affair with Heppell Baguley would probably have been recognised as BOG last Saturday.
Click to expand...

Heppell was Best on Ground (for a half), Baguley was best on ground for 4 quarters.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

BrunoV said:
Which half? Watch the replay. It's actually ridiculous.
Click to expand...
Bruno, it's not ridiculous to say Heppell was best on in the second half. At the time I gave Heppell the five votes in our MVP but if I had my time again, I'd probably have said Baguley was best on overall for being most consistent.

However, Heppell's second half was undeniably massive.
 
Doss said:
Bruno, it's not ridiculous to say Heppell was best on in the second half. At the time I gave Heppell the five votes in our MVP but if I had my time again, I'd probably have said Baguley was best on overall for being most consistent.

However, Heppell's second half was undeniably massive.
Click to expand...
Speaking of which, why is the MVP thread locked?
 
I had Bags as best on, with Hepp second best.
 
scezza said:
Speaking of which, why is the MVP thread locked?
Click to expand...
Because Hirdisymhero tallied the votes and updated the count last night.
 
Doss said:
Because Hirdisymhero tallied the votes and updated the count last night.
Click to expand...
Fair enough, seems earlier than normal. The last votes cast was Tuesday 9:44 am.
 
scezza said:
Fair enough, seems earlier than normal. The last votes cast was Tuesday 9:44 am.
Click to expand...
The custom has always been five or so days after the game.

It was open until yesterday.
 
Doss said:
Bruno, it's not ridiculous to say Heppell was best on in the second half. At the time I gave Heppell the five votes in our MVP but if I had my time again, I'd probably have said Baguley was best on overall for being most consistent.

However, Heppell's second half was undeniably massive.
Click to expand...


It is when you watch the second half in the cold hard light of day.

I am not even sure he had 29.
 
Doss said:
The custom has always been five or so days after the game.

It was open until yesterday.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I guess it was just a case of people not voting as much as usual.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

eth-dog said:
Other than his slight lack of pace, is he bad at anything?
Click to expand...

I had some question marks over his disposal. Think he, along with Cale Hooker have honed in on there expectations to what they can actually do and have improved out of sight in this (disposal decision making) department.


Apart from that, his pace is fine for me (obviously the super quick small forwards will burn him off but how many super quick small defenders are there in the AFL?), his nous and reading of the play are finally marrying up which is allowing him to intercept more of the ball and to run and create more.
 
Any word on Baguley?
 
Harlequin said:
Any word on Baguley?
Click to expand...

Its not getting any mention anywhere its like it didnt happen. The fact we may lose one of our most important players apperantly isn't newsworthy
 
ManWithNoName said:
Or it means it's nothing significant.
Click to expand...

methinks not
BwRKv0vCQAAbKU6.jpg
 
rumply said:
methinks not
BwRKv0vCQAAbKU6.jpg
Click to expand...
And going by pictures Selwood was missing two weeks with suspension.

Could just be a cut in the right place. We'll find out. He walked off and looked okay. Looked clean too, like they wiped it off him and no more blood was coming out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Duckworth
Delisted #38: Rhett Montgomerie - Not offered a contract for 2024 - 28/8
4 5 6 7 8
Replies
196
Views
19K
Zach Package
Zach Package

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top