Allan Border Medal

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah, it hardly fills you with any excitement leading up to the event.

My favourite memory was Colin 'Funky' Miller winning test player of the year, that was awesome!
Doesn't help that it isn't shown live on TV, and we know he winner before the broadcast starts. Doesn't look like we even get it at all on Channel 9 in Adelaide.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

This is why the award is crap, only really 2 people were going to win the main award, either smith or warner.
It was really only ever gonna end like this.

It's like an AFL best and fairest. Half of them the winner is a dead cert certainty, a quarter of them there's a clear favourite with some competition, whilst only about a quarter are a two or three horse race.

When CA started the award it had a bit of suspense because we had half a dozen guys who contributed to wins with regularity and all had varying levels of a chance to win. Now that we don't have that, it really becomes a pretty obvious winner walking in. And in this day and age with ODI and T20 specialists, rotation policies etc,. this has only become more pronounced as only a handful play enough games to make a mark in the voting.

I read an article bemoaning the fact that ODI and T20 specialists were virtually no chance to win the award, but that is exactly how it should be IMO.

Smith a well deserved winner, but I wouldn't be surprised if sometime in the future this event gets relegated to a presentation after one of the January ODI's.

Imagine if a guy like AB De Villiers came along for Australia. He'd win it every year for 10 years and the night would just become an annual coronation.
 
Twenty20 International Player of the Year - Glenn Maxwell, 2014 calendar year:

50 T20 Matches

Batting
49 Innings (2 not out)
1,126 Runs (7 fifties, 0 hundreds, 6 ducks) @ 23.96 average
650 Balls Faced @ 173.23 strike rate
94 Fours and 71 Sixes @ 3.94 balls per boundary

Bowling
28 Innings
11 Wickets @ 43.55 average
479 Runs Against (10 wides, 0 no balls) @ 8.26 economy rate
348 Balls Bowled @ 31.64 strike rate

Fielding
34 catches, 0 stumpings, 5 run outs
 
Only international matches count

Really?:

12 T20I Matches

Batting
12 Innings (0 not outs)
241 Runs (1 fifty, 0 hundreds, 1 duck) @ 20.08 average
137 Balls Faced @ 175.91 strike rate
22 Fours and 16 Sixes @ 3.61 balls per boundary

Bowling
10 Innings
9 Wickets @ 23.88 average
215 Runs Against (4 wides, 1 no ball) @ 6.94 economy rate
186 Balls Bowled @ 20.67 strike rate

Fielding
9 catches, 0 stumpings, 1 run out
 
10955611_10153041411589313_8345039124438226906_n.jpg


BTW, this photo just screams "w*nker!"
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I read an article bemoaning the fact that ODI and T20 specialists were virtually no chance to win the award, but that is exactly how it should be IMO.

pretty sure they changed it so tests got much greater weighting after the year Martyn didn't win it and the players kicked up a fuss.

Imagine if a guy like AB De Villiers came along for Australia. He'd win it every year for 10 years and the night would just become an annual coronation.

we had ponting/gilly/mcgrath/warne in the same team, if any of them were in the team at their peak it would have been the same. just how it works with cricket i guess.
 
When CA started the award it had a bit of suspense because we had half a dozen guys who contributed to wins with regularity and all had varying levels of a chance to win. Now that we don't have that, it really becomes a pretty obvious winner walking in. And in this day and age with ODI and T20 specialists, rotation policies etc,. this has only become more pronounced as only a handful play enough games to make a mark in the voting.

.

Clarke won his first one, despite Damien Martyn dominating test cricket that year (won Test player of the year) but then late in the Tri-Series he was rested for the last 4 matches. Clarke was promoted to opener and made a few runs and ended up pipping Marto by a handful of votes.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top