If the verdict is found to be not guilty, then you could probably assume that the staff that have departed were seen to have been key players in overseeing the governance of the affair; with no more staff requiring to go unless the club addresses this otherwise.
I would suggest that if there is an element of guilt found, that there will be more blood letting, as it would be called for by the members themselves. So the potential is still there for the instance of a "wave of sackings" to occur - awaiting the outcome.
No, no, no.
The outcome will be decided by legalities (what evidence is admissable, burden of proof required), with perhaps an element of the Tribunal's (if it gets that far) gut feel of how to interpret the circumstantial "evidence".
It will in no way establish the truth as to whether any player was administered anything illegal.
The idea that a guilty verdict and suspensions must mean that people will be sacked, and a not guilty verdict means the opposite, is too simplistic.
There will a large number of people, EFC supporters and non supporters, who will think this way, but I can't agree with it.