Go Bruce, now it would be great to see the doc have a crack at WADAEssendon doctor Bruce Reid also took umbrage with the report, and is believed to have threatened defamation action.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Go Bruce, now it would be great to see the doc have a crack at WADAEssendon doctor Bruce Reid also took umbrage with the report, and is believed to have threatened defamation action.
ugh. I'm going to hold off on being "explosive" but c'mon maaaaan. There was not "no evidence". Far from it.
given they will still sit out the year either way, is the very slim likelihood their names will be cleared worth another year of this media circus? At some point they just need to accept that the actions of the entire club, including the players, in 2012 was well below what is expected of a professional sporting club.Not sure if serious?
Players believe they are not guilty yet have been sentenced as drug cheats and your unsure of what the reward would be of they won their case?
Don't think the club will fund the appeal if players were taking legal action against the club.
given they will still sit out the year either way, is the very slim likelihood their names will be cleared worth another year of this media circus? At some point they just need to accept that the actions of the entire club, including the players, in 2012 was well below what is expected of a professional sporting club.
Selfish? It doesnt affect me either way.A 100% selfish post - Thank God you aren't in control of the justice system.
given they will still sit out the year either way, is the very slim likelihood their names will be cleared worth another year of this media circus?
Their beef is that they don't have a backup ruck for their backup ruck. Their public statements are about being a player less than Essendon (cue public outrage, but they chose to be a player less than us back in November, regardless of the suspensions). God knows their submission to the AFL probably blathered on about caveat emptor and the Monfries trade. Playing games hard, and losing.So Ports whole beef is that they will be one player short compared to Essendon?
Selfish? It doesnt affect me either way.
What media circus? There will be nothing happening right up until there's a hearing held in camera. Once the news of the appeal dies down and footy starts you won't hear a word about itgiven they will still sit out the year either way, is the very slim likelihood their names will be cleared worth another year of this media circus? At some point they just need to accept that the actions of the entire club, including the players, in 2012 was well below what is expected of a professional sporting club.
As long as he isn't suckered into a French cut...I don't think you have to worry about this with Worsfold as coach. His forward defence is pretty effective, and usually leads to the journos at the presser throwing something short and wide.
Flimsy wouldn't be far from it.ugh. I'm going to hold off on being "explosive" but c'mon maaaaan. There was not "no evidence". Far from it.
It is to them.the players certainly have the right to appeal if they so desire, but FFS this saga just wont go away! The chances of them winning is SOOOOOOOOOOO low, and the reward for winning will be what exactly?? Is it really worth another year of uncertainty and media frenzy?
Is that because you think it's a waste of time or because you think the process of investigation and prosecution was all above-board and free of corruption?sure haven't
guess theres no s**t eating journos reporting on the inside AFL facts anymore huh. WHere are you Caro you old bitchThese bogans should be complaining about the remaining AFL clubs - I have no doubt the AFL asked for submissions from the 13 clubs unaffected, and it suggests these clubs gave the thumbs down to Top Up Players.