Yeah we should probably just give him a brown paper bag instead.
No just shut your mouth and be happy that you get a quality player for next to nothing. You don't have to be a dick on an Internet forum about it .....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah we should probably just give him a brown paper bag instead.
EFA.It's nice to have an academy so that these players are actually drafted by my team on the cheap.
No just shut your mouth and be happy that you get a quality player for next to nothing. You don't have to be a dick on an Internet forum about it .....
EFA.
Don't try to spin it, the academy kids are sweet deals for the northern clubs. Thanks god, Heeney and Mills were so prominent and so good. The AFL didn't like it, on top of Tippett and Franklin. If not for Heeney and Mills, the northern clubs would still be picking up academy kids with 2nd and 3rd round picks.
I'd be ticked off with the AFL for changing the system to a bidding one if I was a northern club too. In Leppo's word "the AFL has taken away an advantage of ours".
I think the metal plate on his skull resolved that issue
EFA.
Don't try to spin it, the academy kids are sweet deals for the northern clubs. Thanks god, Heeney and Mills were so prominent and so good. The AFL didn't like it, on top of Tippett and Franklin. If not for Heeney and Mills, the northern clubs would still be picking up academy kids with 2nd and 3rd round picks.
I'd be ticked off with the AFL for changing the system to a bidding one if I was a northern club too. In Leppo's word "the AFL has taken away an advantage of ours".
The problem is that if they want a mid at pick 3 they may be better to pick their man (Parish?) and say to him they rate him higher... Would be werid for Parish if they went:
Pick 3: Hopper Bid (Gws matched)
Pick 4: Mills Bid (Swans matched)
Pick 5: Kennedy Bid (GWS Matched)
Pick 6: Keays bid.... na fcuk it...Parish you will do
More likely is they will bid on one to keep AFL off their back as they are suppose to give a crap about making academy clubs honest
its worth noting the academies don't run themselves, it costs money paid for by the clubs...
They keep numbers from every game these guys play down to the under 16s, so they have plenty of data to base their opinion of guys like Burton on.
Worth noting that the title and the OP have no mention of Carlton at all - it's just a thread about Champion Data's rankings.
Cool story mate. All I have ever done is give my opinion because it's my opinion.
I found it interesting that Champion Data actually looked at the numbers and said Schache's better, it's the most interesting aspect of their top 30, so I started a topic on it.
Most other opinions get formed on media hype, I like that when an expert statistics company dedicated to AFL analysis took an honest objective look at the numbers, they came up with the same conclusion I already have.
In the end though I just have an opinion and I'm sharing it - on a football opinion-sharing website, what a crime. You'll have to find some way to live with that. Or you can just keep rabidly attacking posters for having their own opinions. It's up to you.
Deep down he probably thinks NM need a messiah and still has grief over Carey no longer being at the club, all these years later. Anyway, He's been on about the Weitering versus Schache thing for ages, as if he has a personal investment. It's either a troll or jealousy, otherwise he'd have shut up by now.Then why start a thread on Champion Data's opinion?
You gave your opinion the other night, but for some reason felt the need to start a new thread about another opinion.....that you don't care about apparently.
And the thread could have been about the Champion Data rankings more generally without the title you gave it. But then again, that's the only reason you started the thread, right?
But sure, on with the thread.
It's nice that the teams invest so much time and money into the academies so guy who would be lost to the game stay involved.It's nice to have an Academy so you can work with Prospects lot Earlier
So called draft tampering works the other way you realise. The players have to reasonably be worth that pick otherwise you might get stuck with them.Bidding on players at a reasonable point in the draft = pissing the corresponding clubs off ???
Why don't you guys just ignore the salary cap or have a VISY contract ready for the next superstar you want to sign!!Yes you are being smug because the gws are getting another great kid due to bullshit concessions given to your franchise by the afl. Congratulations .....
Well it's certainly not Melbourne is it?? All these arguments about the northern clubs fail to realise that without them your precious Demons would probably cease to exist as the TV money would probably half.Hahaha who is paying the money again?
Why don't you guys just ignore the salary cap or have a VISY contract ready for the next superstar you want to sign!!
You're kidding aren't you? Please tell me that's a joke. Your club is doing it because of what benefits you get from it at the draft table and if Collingwood were allowed by the AFL to have a similar academy, they would pour so much more money into it (thus doing more to develop the game) than you do it wouldn't be funny!It's nice that the teams invest so much time and money into the academies so guy who would be lost to the game stay involved.
I don't see Collingwood doing to much to help out with the development of AFL across the country
And how much more than the rest of the competition were the Lions paying their players when they won their premiership??? Oh wait it was alright because the afl allowed it.
You're kidding aren't you? Please tell me that's a joke. Your club is doing it because of what benefits you get from it at the draft table and if Collingwood were allowed by the AFL to have a similar academy, they would pour so much more money into it (thus doing more to develop the game) than you do it wouldn't be funny!
On talent alone, these are the players he believes are the top five in the draft.
1. Jacob Weitering, Dandenong Stingrays
DOB: 23/11/97; Height: 195cm; Weight: 90kg
Jacob is an outstanding key position prospect as a defender. He’s a great size at 195cm, has speed, power and balance, and keeps his feet. He can play in a zone off role or one on one, plays the angles very well and has outstanding ability to maneuver his opponent where he wants him to go (and into non dangerous spots). Jacob has excellent right foot skills, has penetration in his kick and accuracy. He’s a very good intercept mark and will attack out of the back half, with an outstanding combination of speed and endurance.
Completely agree with you. I'm not sure any recruiter has ever gone "let's check his SuperCoach point to see if he'll be a good pick up".Like someone else has said, defenders always score competitively lower numbers in things like this due to a lot less input into the play that results actual goals. They also can't account for the intangibles such as leadership and character. I'd be incredibly pissed at Carlton if they suddenly did a about-face and drafted Schache instead. All the point of this thread is good for is to give hope to Brisbane or to help consolidate the prejudices of people who wish further negativity on Carlton.
Completely agree with you. I'm not sure any recruiter has ever gone "let's check his SuperCoach point to see if he'll be a good pick up".
As a lions supporter I'm glad we got Schache but Wietering looks like a gun for Carlton.
I wonder what SOS would have averaged in SuperCoach.
Gee hadn't thought about that. But given the kind of things he sanctioned when leading that club it could be possible I guess.Did whoosha invite the girl into his tent? Did woosha king hit him in northbridge?